Posted on 08/19/2014 11:11:23 AM PDT by fishtank
http://boggybayoumulletfestival.info/
Come on down! It’s great!...................
Well, if that’s all you got, I guess you didn’t bother to read the rest of the article.
I did, and it’s just a more complicated version of the same point: rejecting anything that doesn’t fit the “10,000 year” axiom by harping on “but _this_ isn’t completely explained”. At best, alternate theories are half-baked and easily dismantled by pointing at indisputable physical phenomena.
Brings me back to my default counter-argument asserting “the universe is only 20 minutes old; refute that”.
“I did, and its just a more complicated version of the same point: rejecting anything that doesnt fit the 10,000 year axiom by harping on but _this_ isnt completely explained.”
Well, the article doesn’t say anything like that, so I can only surmise you just have this notion in your head, regardless of the content.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.