I did, and it’s just a more complicated version of the same point: rejecting anything that doesn’t fit the “10,000 year” axiom by harping on “but _this_ isn’t completely explained”. At best, alternate theories are half-baked and easily dismantled by pointing at indisputable physical phenomena.
Brings me back to my default counter-argument asserting “the universe is only 20 minutes old; refute that”.
“I did, and its just a more complicated version of the same point: rejecting anything that doesnt fit the 10,000 year axiom by harping on but _this_ isnt completely explained.”
Well, the article doesn’t say anything like that, so I can only surmise you just have this notion in your head, regardless of the content.