Posted on 08/18/2014 5:51:48 PM PDT by lbryce
Via WaPo:
Michael Brown was shot in the head and chest multiple times, according to Mary Case, the St. Louis County medical examiner.
While Case declined to comment further, citing the ongoing investigation into Browns death, another person familiar with the countys investigation told The Washington Post that Brown had between six and eight gunshot wounds and was shot from the front.
In addition, Brown had marijuana in his system when he was shot and killed by a police officer on Aug. 9 in Ferguson, according to this person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.
The report from Cases office was released to the St. Louis County prosecutors office on Friday night but has not been made public. This report is part of the countys official investigation into the shooting, but it is one of three autopsies being conducted
(Excerpt) Read more at redflagnews.com ...
Reefer madness!
I am dubious that pot was the chief thing on which Mike was high, if he was high. Potheads DO tend to be mellow, if stupified. Brown was about as unmellow as they get.
By the time the media is done with this having marajuana in his system will only be further proof that he was not aggressive.
No, no, no!
He was a Model of Propriety - clearly these results are a plant by vested interests.
Debbie Schlussel blog also says the Ferguson store Michael Brown and his partner in crime Dorian Johnson robbed likely financing Palestinian Islamic terrorism used as front to illegally transfer funds to entities in the Palestinian Authority. The store sold stolen cigarettes (and other contraband), often a scheme by American Muslims to finance HAMAS and Hezbollah.
Agreed - more than pot in his system.
Did they test for Swisher Sweets?
She was killed by white men who were trying to protect The Lightworker. Therefore, it's cool. Don't expect anything from Jesse or Al.
You have a confrontation with police and your lab reports
show induced use of any narcotics, it will be a issue.
I also agree, bet he was cranked up on something besides weed. They probably gave him the equivalent of a piss test that showed positive for pot. I wonder if testing for other, harder drugs takes longer and the samples have to be sent off to a lab?
Of course it was medical marijuana.
And the photo of him smoking crack from a glass pipe was medical cocaine.
Cops just want to kill people and dogs.
“The store sold stolen cigarettes (and other contraband)”
That’s interesting.
That helps explain why the owner didn’t want to go to the cops about the robbery and also how the Browns who live in the area know they can just bully their way in to taking things from stores like that.
They’ve got their own little Eco-system going.
“I also agree, bet he was cranked up on something besides weed. “
Undoubtably. There is a photo of him free basing.
But the pharmacokinetics of cocaine or meth, especially when smoked, are such the drug is out of the system much more quickly than marijuana.
Yeah, but she was a young woman with a child. Brown was an adult and a criminal. He didn’t deserve to be arrested, or shot at after assaulting a police officer, attempted murder, fleeing the scene of a crime,etc.
I’m guessing PCP.
me too.
They knew he would show positive. Heck, 97% of the people in Ferguson would probably show positive. Pot stays in the system for a long time. It normally makes you mellow.
It's like copping a plea.
Let the public know he was high on pot, because it won't prove a thing. It might even make the public assume he couldn't be the murderous thug the cops say, because if he was stoned, he wasn't violent.
So now the public is passified, believing that is all there was.
Other drugs take more stringent and time consuming tests to reveal the results.
However, it may be that pot was all he was doing. Not likely, but possible.
AMP or SHERMS is my guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.