To: McGruff
“strong arm robbery” - that would be “unarmed”, wouldn’t it?
Obviously, if he was “unarmed”, then he presented no threat to the alleged “robbery” victim.
22 posted on
08/15/2014 7:27:13 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB
Obviously, if he was unarmed, then he presented no threat to the alleged robbery victim. This comment was missing the sarcasm (/s)tag, right?
77 posted on
08/15/2014 7:43:18 AM PDT by
Thommas
(The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
To: MrB
Obviously, if he was unarmed, then he presented no threat to the alleged robbery victim.
People are killed by the hands/fists of others too often. Unarmed does not mean no threat.
126 posted on
08/15/2014 7:59:47 AM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(Your feelings don't trump my free speech!)
To: MrB
Obviously, if he was unarmed, then he presented no threat to the alleged robbery victim.
Surely you jest and/or forgot your "/s" tag.
Even at my peak as a Marine I'd have a tough time with this "teen."
148 posted on
08/15/2014 8:06:59 AM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: MrB
Even if he didn’t have a gun, he was “armed” - with his fists, feet and his sheer size.
The clerk being intimidated in those photos looks terrified - too bad HE didn’t have a gun - there’s a reason Col. Colt called it the “equalizer.”
209 posted on
08/15/2014 8:53:54 AM PDT by
Bon of Babble
(Given enough coffee...I could rule the world!!)
To: MrB
In my opinion being ‘unarmed’ does not transform into ‘no danger’. Physical beatings can be/are dangerous to the point of maiming or death and looking at the size of the ‘young boy’ and his pictured actions I tend to think he was a bully boy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson