Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright; JRandomFreeper

Here’s how I feel. If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals — if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.


66 posted on 08/14/2014 1:16:25 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods

I agree with some of that, but I have a few caveats.

Many libertarians cannot understand the concept that liberty is NOT license, and that there can be no liberty in societies of chaos.

I would also say that conservative and liberal mean what they mean…TODAY. What they used to mean, what ‘classical liberal’ used to mean, is really just a point of interest. It is what it is now. That horse done left the barn.

But as a conservative, I consider myself in agreement with about 80% of libertarianism. But a lot of libertarian claimers, including Rand Paul and Neil Boortz, are NOT libertarian at all in many ways. Same with a lot of young paul bots.


67 posted on 08/14/2014 1:24:10 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson