I have no idea what you're arguing, but guilt by association is a fallacious argument.
Say Quannell X the rabble-rouser, the NAACP, the MSM and the Attorney (?) all agree wife beating is bad. If you agree with them that it is bad, does that mean I should conclude that you agree with EVERYTHING these people say? Clearly not, yet that is what you are implying. Will you support wife beating simply because they oppose it? Probably not.
Please debate arguments, don't attack people.
Uncle Chip and I were conversing about an INJUSTICE in Houston. The UNARMED man was shot by a chick and the only “story” being told, considering the man was dead (walking up to a car, shot multiple times). The NAACP, the Attorney, the MSM, and Quannell X were on scene immediately while the victim’s body still lay in the gas station parking lot. The woman in question had just been cited for (within a week) road rage. Unless you are a relative of Crystal Scott, or have been keeping up with the case, you don’t know what you are talking about. Since Chip was on this thread, I made my comment to Chip only. Your statement to me?
Quannell, The NAACP (Houston), the Attorney in question, and the MSM all DESERVE the criticism. They are “race baiting” by trashing a dead guy and trying the case in the media. Trying a case in the media is lynch mob mentality.