And next week, and next month what happened in Murietta, CA will be declared a riot situation and the National Civilian Security Force will be called out to disperse anyone attempting to stop busses of Illegals from being dropped off in their town.
You do not get it. Not at all.
You have no idea where this precedent is going to be directed - and yet some of us see it as if it were last year’s news.
As I said before, you obviously have no problem living in a police state.
Enjoy.
Invar, this is not evidence of a police state. It is evidence of a circumstance where crowd control was imperative.
It was an idiotic idea to go out there and protest in a riot zone. The police needed to have the area cleared. Law abiding citizens should have understood and complied with the officers instead of causing trouble.
Not only did it interfere with the police trying to keep the area under control, it put the protesters in danger.
I wouldn’t want my wife out there. I wouldn’t want my brother out there.
Criminal activity has been taking place. Death and destruction have resulted. No the good people of the area decide it’s a great idea to mix decent folks violent thugs and rioters. Rational?
Here you hare fixated on the officers being armed. As I said before perhaps to you, those officers have my permission to shoot rioters on sight. End of story.
If you think that’s a police state, then you evidently don’t know what used to take place when rioters were observed doing what rioters do.
Care to talk about that precedent. Police state?
The rioters got a free pass for several nights. Is that your idea of a police state?
Wow...
Who here doesn’t get it?
>> and next month what happened in Murietta, CA will be declared a riot situation
There was no property destruction, theft, or mayhem in Murietta.