Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bamahead
Upon review of all the parties’ evidence, the court seriously doubts that the banned assault long guns are commonly possessed for lawful purposes, particularly self-defense in the home, which is at the core of the Second Amendment right,

He has already gotten it wrong with the first sentence. The 2A states in the beginning its purpose, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.". And who is the Militia? By FEDERAL LAW, it is comprised of all able bodied citizens.

42 posted on 08/12/2014 3:58:13 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

She.

Which might explain a lot.


223 posted on 08/13/2014 5:33:29 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson