Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/06/2014 2:36:58 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Kid Shelleen

Where is the ASPCA ?


2 posted on 08/06/2014 2:40:11 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen; null and void; All
thanks, for the post. 👌...JBT ping.
3 posted on 08/06/2014 2:40:35 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

Do you need to make a donation to the Police Athletic League and get a Please Don’t shoot any dogs on this premises sticker for your windows and doors?

What a sad state we as a nation are in, no one is safe. Even the home security system, the dog.


4 posted on 08/06/2014 2:41:35 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

It’s all part of the “Blue Code.” Several years ago, it was a common practice for rookie cops assigned to a rough neighborhood to shoot a dog on the street. First thing. First day. With witnesses. That sent the message to not screw with the new cop.

The message has not changed. The intended audience has.


7 posted on 08/06/2014 2:44:20 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

I totally agree. Police are too quick to shoot dogs. Now, what can we do about it?


8 posted on 08/06/2014 2:44:28 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

9 posted on 08/06/2014 2:46:15 PM PDT by Brother Cracker ( Mossberg 500 helps me deal with being old and cranky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

It’s time for a “Willy Pete’s law”.


10 posted on 08/06/2014 2:46:47 PM PDT by fulltlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

That’s right! Stop shootin our dogs everytime we turn around. And no, that does not instantly mean it’s Open Season on our Cats & Rats & Unicorns!


11 posted on 08/06/2014 2:48:30 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

Yes! Stop shooting our Dogs! No, that does not mean it’s now Open Season on Cats & Rats & Unicorns.


13 posted on 08/06/2014 2:51:22 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
In most of the cases I've read about there was NO justification for shooting the dog.

Apparently the officer just wanted to shoot something. I cannot think of any other reason.

This propensity should be considered the consequence of a mental issue making that officer unfit to patrol let alone be allowed a weapon.

14 posted on 08/06/2014 2:51:24 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

If a dog charges you in a confined area, you don’t really have much time to draw a weapon, do you? If the dog meant you harm, you’d have some bite or claw marks to prove it.


17 posted on 08/06/2014 2:52:51 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
excerpt: If the U.S. were overrun by dangerous dogs, you would think we’d hear a lot more about a biting epidemic. Yet postal workers, meter readers and pizza deliverymen—among others—all manage to do their jobs without either getting maimed by pets or killing them. It seems awfully curious that police officers seem to be the only ones who face such a stark either/or.

seems pretty clear

18 posted on 08/06/2014 2:54:08 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
and yet another doughnut muncher earns their dog shooter merit badge...
dogshoter2
dogshooter3


21 posted on 08/06/2014 3:06:23 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
"...so he fired his weapon as required by training."

Why do I hear in my mind, "destructive of these ends" and "alter or abolish"?
22 posted on 08/06/2014 3:15:19 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
Why should they treat dogs better than humans? They murdered a man in full public view just a few days ago, and it's not the first, and not gonna be the last as long as we allow them the power.

End prohibition! End the police state!

24 posted on 08/06/2014 3:28:47 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
It's time for cops to stop shooting people running away:

“It looked suspect to me,” said Teresa Graham, who watched the shooting unfold while stopped at a nearby traffic light. “I just don’t know why she had to shoot him like that — four times, when he’s trying to run away.”

“I don’t know why they were talking,” she said. “Then all of a sudden, (the officer) yelled something and she tried Tasing him, but missed. When the guy started to run away, (the officer) immediately threw the Taser down, pulled her gun out and shot.”

The man seemed to be running in slow motion — possibly drunkenly — as he attempted to flee, Graham said. That’s when the officer fired four shots, several of which appeared to hit the man, she added.

“I didn’t see anything in his hands,” Graham added. “I didn’t see him do anything physical or threatening. I’ve just never seen anything like that before in my life — a person just getting shot like that. It was just heartbreaking.”

http://thedailyworld.com/sections/newswire/northwest/panhandler-shot-injured-after-charging-tacoma-police-officer.html

In spite of these multiple eye-witness accounts of a bad shoot, the incident was whitewashed, and the officer is back on patrol without a single stain on her record.

Here's the whitewashed version:

"Cool said Saturday the man hit the officer in the arm with a pipe-like object when she asked him to move as he was panhandling about 3:15 p.m. near East 28th Street and East Portland Avenue. The officer tried to subdue the man with a Taser, and when that failed and he continued to attack, she fired, Cool said."

Read more here: http://blog.thenewstribune.com/crime/2013/07/01/no-change-in-condition-of-tacoma-panhandler-shot-by-officer/#storylink=cpy

Emphasis Added.

There has never been a resolution of the officer's shooting reported in the press. This poor guy was nuts, but was RUNNING away from the officer when she BACK SHOT HIM.

25 posted on 08/06/2014 3:38:02 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

A pit bull isn’t a dog but rather a monster. They need to be shot in many situations...oh and the liberals out there that own them and rename them, ‘pitties’...that’s like the Cincinnati zoo calling their hyenas African painted dogs. Over last 2 months in Cincy 3 people have been killed by potties.


27 posted on 08/06/2014 4:04:58 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (We the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen
The release says the dog “lunged at [the deputy] so he fired his weapon as required by training.”

REQUIRED? Do we really need cops who are REQUIRED by their training to act in completely illogical ways? Do we need cops who obviously can't think their way out of a wet paper bag? Does the fool who wrote that release realize how incredibly incompetent and useless he makes the police department sound with that statement?

32 posted on 08/06/2014 4:39:50 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

The trouble is that, with harder economic times, there are going to be more threatening wild dog packs, so “not killing dogs” is not an absolute. More appropriately, “not killing owned dogs that are not running free.”

Animal shelters are always barely afloat, even in good economic times, but it must be remembered that they are a convenience. In most large cities, animal shelters kill thousands of animals a year. Not really different than them being gunned down by cops.


35 posted on 08/06/2014 5:08:33 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kid Shelleen

Attention Officer, you shoot one of my springer spaniels, I will kill you. Any questions?


36 posted on 08/06/2014 6:04:28 PM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson