Skip to comments.
Ebola test carried out after air passenger death in UK at Gatwick -- tests negative for ebola
BBC News ^
| Aug 3, 2014
| BBC
Posted on 08/03/2014 4:48:17 PM PDT by Innovative
A test for Ebola has been carried out on a female passenger who died after arriving in the UK from The Gambia.
The Department for Health said the test on the woman, who landed at Gatwick Airport on Saturday, came back negative on Sunday afternoon.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ebola; gatwick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
False alarm -- this time...
To: Innovative
There would be total panic if it had come back positive so draw your own conclusion.
2
posted on
08/03/2014 4:49:42 PM PDT
by
bergmeid
To: bergmeid
We’ll know in a few weeks.
3
posted on
08/03/2014 4:51:08 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: bergmeid
4
posted on
08/03/2014 4:51:43 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: Innovative
So what if it is something as deadly as eboli but they haven't found out what it is and they are spreading it?
5
posted on
08/03/2014 4:52:21 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Innovative
Because all lab tests, particularly the rapid field tests, are always 100% correct...
6
posted on
08/03/2014 4:52:47 PM PDT
by
Mom MD
To: Innovative
So, all the passengers and crew on the flight have now been released from quarantine?
7
posted on
08/03/2014 4:54:09 PM PDT
by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: Mom MD
Just like those early pregnancy tests. I have a ‘negative’ pregnancy test eating rice chex right now.
To: Innovative
It would certainly help if, in addition to claiming she tested negative for ebola, they gave what the cause of death was. Had she been sick for some time, or only developed sickness on the flight? Just hearing the negative ebola test is not enough information with the world-wide ebola concerns.
9
posted on
08/03/2014 4:56:53 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Innovative
I’m sure they will let everyone know the cause of this woman’s death. Hopefully we won’t see the word “unexpectedly” start popping up there, too.
10
posted on
08/03/2014 4:57:29 PM PDT
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: bergmeid
“There would be total panic if it had come back positive so draw your own conclusion.”
They may indeed think that panic is worse than if ebola actually spreads...
11
posted on
08/03/2014 4:58:48 PM PDT
by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: Black Agnes
I have a negative pregnancy test eating rice chex right now. Now that is funny!!
To: Grams A
Let’s remember Mr. Stevens...the first person to die from anthrax. It took them how long to tell us?? 2? 3? weeks??
To: softwarecreator
I pity any women who are in the first trimester who have to fly. Their body temp will be elevated slightly and they might throw up. Oh noes!
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
Years ago, an elderly passenger on an Olympic Air flight from Athens died in the aisle just as we landed in NY. The stews had us stop over the body on the way out the door. I never flew Olympic again.
Point is, these things happen.
16
posted on
08/03/2014 5:03:14 PM PDT
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: EDINVA
It would certainly help if, in addition to claiming she tested negative for ebola, they gave what the cause of death was. Had she been sick for some time, or only developed sickness on the flight? Just hearing the negative ebola test is not enough information with the world-wide ebola concerns.
They reported she was fine on the flight. Her symptoms could also have been related to other travel related illnesses. We will have to wait for the autopsy. Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolisms are travel risks.
Air TravelRelated Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
17
posted on
08/03/2014 5:05:03 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
To: Innovative
I thought it was transmitted by contact with body fluids from an infected person.
To: Veto!
19
posted on
08/03/2014 5:05:32 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: tet68
Well know in a few weeks.
Yup. Be aware but don't panic.
I saw something that struck me as odd a couple hours ago. A National Guard helicopter traveling with the UofM hospital life flight chopper. Neither is unusual by themselves but I'd never seen them both traveling side by side like that.
20
posted on
08/03/2014 5:06:12 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson