1 posted on
07/30/2014 10:02:58 AM PDT by
QT3.14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: QT3.14
Opportunities for enlisted women are changing because in 2013 the DoD retracted the 1994 Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule, which excluded women from being assigned "to units below the brigade level whose primary mission was to engage in direct combat on the ground." Now that the barriers are down, in the name of equality when is Congress going subject females to the draft?
2 posted on
07/30/2014 10:04:59 AM PDT by
QT3.14
(USA born 7.4.1776 fathered by geniuses, died 11.4.2008 (Suicide) by idiots and traitors)
To: QT3.14
Interesting times ahead in the shared beds and in sailors’ precruise discussions with their spouses.
3 posted on
07/30/2014 10:05:59 AM PDT by
ogen hal
(First amendment or reeducation camp)
To: QT3.14
Does Joe know that one of the three legs of our nuclear deterrent is on board submarines? Oh, never mind.
4 posted on
07/30/2014 10:07:10 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: QT3.14
And when the first romantic triangle causes an issue... then what?
5 posted on
07/30/2014 10:07:28 AM PDT by
Bogey78O
(We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
To: QT3.14
Subs will have to pop up every now and then to unload the babies.
6 posted on
07/30/2014 10:08:10 AM PDT by
mfish13
(Elections have Consequences.)
To: QT3.14
Will give a whole new meaning to the term “hot racking”.
7 posted on
07/30/2014 10:10:07 AM PDT by
AU72
To: QT3.14
9 posted on
07/30/2014 10:14:05 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: QT3.14
Does the command “dive, dive, dive” change to “go down, go down, go down”? ;)
10 posted on
07/30/2014 10:14:49 AM PDT by
FrankR
(They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
To: QT3.14
To: QT3.14; NFHale; Impy
Its party time!
Coming in future :
‘Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand alarmed at the number of rapes on US Navy submarines demands investigations by independent investigators and rulings independent judges, says the military can not be trusted to discipline their own’
Just wait
14 posted on
07/30/2014 10:21:17 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: QT3.14
There have been some cases of girls getting pregnant somehow on Navy ship deployments. I think the same could happen on a submarine. There’s something about people being in close quarters which pulls the trigger on it.
To: QT3.14
Hundreds of sexual harassment cases in the making. When sex inevitably occurs the lawyers will be unleashed and peoples careers will be ruined.
To: QT3.14
The old joke comes to mind:
Q. What is long and hard and filled with seamen?
A. A submarine.
To: QT3.14
In related news, I have just patented a “Subsurface Crew-Ejection Capsule” capable of being launched from a torpedo tube.
It will allow pregnant female enlisted crew members to be able to leave the boat while on patrol.
/sarc
20 posted on
07/30/2014 10:29:09 AM PDT by
BwanaNdege
( "Our Emperor may have no clothes, but doesn't he have a wonderful tan" - MSM)
To: QT3.14
To: QT3.14
I think this is just the next step in a process that started a number of years ago to tap into a talented part of the Navy "Tap into"...indeed!
22 posted on
07/30/2014 10:33:09 AM PDT by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: QT3.14
Loading a torpedo into a tube, no doubt, will have a new meaning now.
23 posted on
07/30/2014 10:33:54 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: QT3.14
Leave it to the morons in Congress to pass a law that attempts to change human nature. Can’t you just see it now - an executive comes down to fire and the feminine side says, “No we can’t kill innocents so disobey.”
Also I suppose there will be a OB/GYN assigned.
24 posted on
07/30/2014 10:35:50 AM PDT by
JayAr36
(A Democrat is defined as a liar and a hypocrite.)
To: QT3.14
I can see no downside to this idea. /S/
27 posted on
07/30/2014 10:41:14 AM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: QT3.14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson