Is this a valid point of view?

Vanity ^ | 7/28/14 | Vanity

[ifinnegan]

I don't care if a pro-Abortion Socialist takes a Senate seat in a normally conservative state.

I don't care that with Alison Grimes in the Senate there could be millions of more abortions around the world and nation wide than if she hadn't won

I don't care because Mitch McConnell is such a nasty guy who insulted me

Mitch must learn a lesson.

Let the babies die.

This thread on the KY Senate race inspired this question.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3186098/posts

[ifinnegan]

Is this a proper attitude?

Is it a false scenario. I don't think so.

Are the die hards who want Grimes the abortion pusher to win not religious?

Is the sin of pride clouding their judgement in wanting the pro-Abortion leftist to be a Senator from KY?

[Wyrd bið ful aræd]

The argument will be that Mitch is no better than Grimes, that just as many abortions happen with him as senator through his inactivity on the issue.

[ifinnegan]

How is that argument backed up?

It’s empty.

It’s actually an overt lie.

[Jim from C-Town]

The honest truth is that I think on the issue of abortion I don’t think it makes much of a difference.

Having Mitch McConnell in the Senate didn’t prevent any of Clinton or Obama’s Supreme court nominations from becoming judges.

Can’t they both lose?

[Perdogg]

I want to know where the people who hated ‘Willard’ two years ago and if they are happy now. Same logic.

[GeronL]

The attitude is that McConnell is a self-avowed enemy of the TEA Party. I don’t “want Grimes to win” and neither would I ever voice any support whatsoever for McConnell.

If I lived in that state I would have no dog in that fight.

[Twotone]

Biting off the nose to spite one’s face. RINO’s should be dealt with in the Primary. If we’re not successful, handing the seat to a Democrat who will help Zero in his agenda is a terrible mistake.

Mitch McConnell is better than a true leftist Democrat, & we can try to take him out again in another two years.

[Nervous Tick]

>> we can try to take him out again in another two years.

How exactly do you propose we do that?

[Yogafist]

Senate terms are 6 years.

[ifinnegan]

Yes.

But it is Six years for the Senate.

It will be a lot easier for a Conservative to take this Senate seat in 2020 if Grimes s not in it.

There is short term feel goodism - ie ha ha Mitch lost — and there is real seriousness planning and working.

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

Did David, during his war with Saul, go and work for the king of the Philistines? No, he went into the wilderness until he could come to grips with what needed to be done.

Wait... no. David did go work for the king of the Philistines.

And Daniel served in the Babylonian and Persian courts.

And Joseph set an extremely punitive tax on the people of Egypt.

And Gideon and his family turned to idolatry after he drove the Philistines from the land.

What does this have to do with abortion? Nothing.

And neither does the fact that the traitors to conservatism in the Republican party need to be cut out like the cancerous growths they are. We need some salt in the wounds and a burning ember to clean out the infection.

Grimes in the Senate would be bad, but not as bad as leaving McConnell there. And I was a big fan of Mitch up until the last couple of years. I defended him on this board. But there have been too many betrayals. He can’t be trusted and needs to go.

[Defiant]

Succinctly and aptly put. A lot of Rino Panty-Wadders here lately.

[ifinnegan]

No.

The budget and where money goes provides for and causes more abortions.

McConnell, RINO as he is, has never supported abortion spending bills or been pro-choice.

[Political Junkie Too]

Did you really need to take your argument from the McConnell-Grimes thread to its own thread?

-PJ

[ifinnegan]

But unless you care nothing about unborn life, or any other issue, you do have a dog in the fight.

You sound like Pontius Pilot.

I wish we didn’t have to have dogs in the fight because it is a dirty fight.

[wku man]

If Romney had won, we'd be on the same track we are now, just moving at a slower pace -- IOW, prolonging the agony, as we did under Jorge Bush. About all we can do at this point is fire a symbolic shot across the bow, 'cause it's not like the damn Pubbies are going to do a friggin' thing to stop the Leftist juggernaut. Load the magazines, boys...it won't be long now.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

[zipper]

I don’t care

for this thread.

[GeronL]

Okay, is there another candidate I don’t know about?

[ifinnegan]

Thanks.

I appreciate you clearly and openly calling for the liberal leftist pro-Abortion Democrat to win.

Now questions for you.

1) Are you pro-choice?

[wku man]

Yep. Two sides of the same ol' statist, all-powerful big government coin. One side is evil, and the other side is cowardly. Either way we lose.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!