Actually the Nixon impeachment was brought by a Repub. If we stay on message and show a direct line from Louis Lerner and the WH the American people and the media are going to have a hard time saying that is fine.
The cover-up and destruction of evidence will be hard to laugh off as will a connection between bringing in children from Central America and excessive EOs. This is not Clinton and may just surprise people.
My guess is the impeachment mailers are coming back empty as is his fundraising. He is getting less popular by the day.
Politics is like golf,when you want it to go one way; hit it the other. what you think is doomed to fail may actually be your ticket to winning.
In our area we have two sayings: It doesn’t matter if you win or lose as long as you have fun. It’s just that winning is a whole lot more fun than losing.
As a Repub you have two choices, you can lose graciously or win ugly and there is no such thing as an ugly win.
Impeachment is winning ugly.
Truth is with all this fund raising he does,I doubt anyone knows the actual origin of any of the money and its probably a good idea to find out. My guess, lots of it coming from the mid-east funneled through surrogates.We know in 08 he got 300 million from the mid-east.Are these the kind of people not to ask the same people over and over again,doubt it.
Well, actually, it wasn't. The democrats controlled the House. It was Barry Goldwater (R-AZ), Hugh Scott (R-PA), and John Rhodes (R-AZ), who meet with President Nixon, and told him that his chances of avoiding impeachment were “gloomy.” Nixon resigned the next morning. The House never had a vote.