Skip to comments.
"I Shot Her Twice,She Best Be Dead!"
Sky Valley Chronicle ^
| 24 July, 2014
| NA
Posted on 07/24/2014 10:08:32 AM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
To: over3Owithabrain
“Moral law takes into account causality.”
And if it comes to a jury trial then not some brain dead OJ jury. But I think it will be settled without a trial. You can’t put an 80 year old guy up on trial for shooting in response to his bodily injuries, He had an equalizer that evened his odds against these callous young punks
81
posted on
07/24/2014 1:19:16 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: marktwain
I read she was in the alley but not sure if she went there after she was shot the first time - but he’s saying she was down and pleading - which is really a dumb thing to say. It’s only his state3ment and it’ll convict him ...
82
posted on
07/24/2014 1:46:29 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
(If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed. If you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
To: Gaffer
Comeon now, a thieving POS thug would never lie about that.
83
posted on
07/24/2014 3:35:15 PM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: marktwain
I don't have any sympathy for the perps, but finishing off someone who claims to be pregnant is cold. Very cold. Maybe she was lying, maybe not, but would you want that on your conscience if she was?
How many of you who are saluting his actions, finishing off a pregnant (so far as he knew) woman, consider yourself pro-life?
84
posted on
07/24/2014 3:39:16 PM PDT
by
Wyrd bið ful aræd
(Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
To: Romulus
he admits on TV that he keeps $22,000 in a safe at home which is going to be interesting to all kinds of people. His Owners will deftly milk that out of him. They won't be pleased that he killed a future cog for The Great Big Giant Crimnel Jesters Machine.
If a judge Owner or prosecutor Owner had done exactly the same thing, a "Teddy Kennedy fog" would have descended until things could be cleared up in favor of the guilty Owner.
85
posted on
07/24/2014 3:59:30 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker; SkyDancer
Only if the jury votes to convict. The problem is that most of the peasants STILL don't understand that Law Is For The Little People.
You'd think the George Zimmerman case would have been a giant cluebat.
86
posted on
07/24/2014 4:03:55 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
To: SkyDancer
His sorry life?
Put yourself in his situation jackass.
87
posted on
07/24/2014 4:06:36 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: greene66
What you said.
I have read accounts of perps running away, only to find cover and shoot back. Anyone giving home invaders the benefit of the doubt needs their head removed from their nether regions.
88
posted on
07/24/2014 4:08:53 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Vermont Lt
BS.
They would both be alive if they had not taken the CHOICE to break into his house.
Actions have consequences.
89
posted on
07/24/2014 4:11:24 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Vermont Lt
Yeah, because there is no such thing as a recidivist criminal/s
Get your head out of your backside.
90
posted on
07/24/2014 4:17:50 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
Pregnant women shouldn’t be robbing houses and beating up 80 yo men. How cam you defend that?
91
posted on
07/24/2014 4:19:49 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: dirtboy
Agreed. I believe everyone is entitled to whatever means of self-defense is at hand. This incident has absolutely nothing to do with self-defense, or protecting one’s property.
92
posted on
07/24/2014 4:22:25 PM PDT
by
lonevoice
(Life is short. Make fun of it.)
To: roadcat; Romulus
Why is that a factor to become "evidence"? Asset forfeiture. It's about Jesters, not Justice.
93
posted on
07/24/2014 4:23:29 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
To: Red in Blue PA
Assuming she was indeed pregnant (as far he he knew, she was) -- the baby inside her had nothing to do his/her mother's actions. Once he became aware that she was pregnant, he had a responsibility to the baby.
If a criminal takes a human shield you can't just blow them both away, especially if the human shield is an innocent baby.
94
posted on
07/24/2014 4:26:58 PM PDT
by
Wyrd bið ful aræd
(Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
He had a responsibility to HIMSELF. Get a frigging clue. He was an 80 yo man who was just beaten up by the two vermin.
95
posted on
07/24/2014 4:36:41 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: Red in Blue PA
He had a responsiblity to that baby.
Being elderly, beaten up, whatever, does not give you the right to kill a baby, particularly when by his own testimony it doesn't sound like finishing the perp off was strictly necessary to keep his own life.
96
posted on
07/24/2014 4:45:07 PM PDT
by
Wyrd bið ful aræd
(Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd; All
“Assuming she was indeed pregnant (as far he he knew, she was)”
He had no such knowledge. Why should he believe a theif and assailant? Criminals lie all the time. Anyone who has dealt with them knows that. They will say whatever they think will be to their advantage at the moment.
97
posted on
07/24/2014 4:52:50 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
To: marktwain
Would you have greased her on the assumption that thieves lie and therefore she was not pregnant?
The autopsy will show if she was pregnant or not. Either way, once that became a factor he should have stayed his hand.
98
posted on
07/24/2014 4:57:57 PM PDT
by
Wyrd bið ful aræd
(Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
I would have shot her if I thought she was a threat to my life or bodily integrity. From his words that we have seen, it does not appear that she was.
I would not give a person immunity because they say they are pregnant. They could simply stop, get down on the floor, and give up. I expect criminals to lie.
Actions are what speak in these situations.
99
posted on
07/24/2014 5:08:02 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
To: Red in Blue PA
In PA you have the same rules as Mass—so I know you went over this in your training.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment. But legally, you know better.
100
posted on
07/24/2014 5:12:16 PM PDT
by
Vermont Lt
(If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson