Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chuck Schumer: End partisan primaries
politico.com ^ | 7/22/14 | Jonathan Topaz

Posted on 07/22/2014 5:11:38 AM PDT by cotton1706

Sen. Chuck Schumer is calling for abolishing partisan primaries, saying the current system engenders unhealthy political polarization.

“The partisan primary system, which favors more ideologically pure candidates, has contributed to the election of more extreme officeholders and increased political polarization,” the New York Democrat wrote in a New York Times op-ed published Monday evening. “It has become a menace to governing.”

Schumer said that partisan primaries embolden “the 10 percent at each of the two extremes of the political spectrum” and pointed to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s surprise loss to Dave Brat, a political novice who ran to the right of Cantor and had the support of the tea party.

In his op-ed piece, Schumer said that partisan primaries have had a particularly pernicious impact on the Republican Party, “where centrists and moderates are increasingly rare.“

Schumer instead called for the country to adopt a “top two” primary system like that in California, where all voters regardless of party cast ballots in a primary election and the top two vote-getters proceed to a general election runoff. Such a system, the senator writes, would force candidates to appeal to the broader electorate as opposed to a small segment on the ideological fringe.

The system in California, he said, has been “a moderating influence on both parties and a salutary effect on the political system and its ability to govern.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: silverleaf

>>single party states are SO much more efficient at carrying out “the will of the people” (aka mob rule)

Massachusetts (where I live). I am unenrolled in either party so I admittedly can help choose a candidate in either party by requesting a Rep. or Dem. ballot—that seems to pose problems, though.. people who might really be on “one side” can help to choose the candidates on the other, as long as they’re unenrolled and can pick one ballot or the other in primaries.

In 2004 I got to vote against Kerry twice (in the primary I picked, ugh, John Edwards...) In the 6th Cong District I can vote against Dem. John Tierney twice—assuming he wins the primary which he prob will


21 posted on 07/22/2014 5:45:32 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
This POS has never had to work at anything. He’s not stupid, and actually is highly intelligent (1600 SAT). Just hyper-partisan marxist.

For some reason libs - or marxists in this case - are great at taking tests.

22 posted on 07/22/2014 5:47:06 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Were their primaries when the Senate was elected by the States? Maybe we should go back to that system if Chuckie is so worried about primaries.


23 posted on 07/22/2014 5:50:50 AM PDT by chrisser (Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
The system in California, he said, has been “a moderating influence on both parties and a salutary effect on the political system and its ability to govern.”

Ok, I knew Chuckie Schummer was STUPID, but I didn't realize that he was completely eat-up with it!

California is a leftist nut-jobs utopia! There is NO "moderation" in California - PERIOD! For him to suggest that their system is better, is PROOF that this is just about getting rid of our supposed two-party system and replace it with a one-party system that so many great communist nations currently employ! You know elections like Bashir Assad, Momar Kodhafi, and Saddam Huessein have or used to have!

Surely Chuckie has seen exactly how most of these one-party systems end, right?!?!
24 posted on 07/22/2014 5:51:05 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Why the government would be in any way involved in choosing a political party's candidate is way beyond me.
25 posted on 07/22/2014 5:59:05 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

“Why the government would be in any way involved in choosing a political party’s candidate is way beyond me.”

The House of Lords wants to choose its own members. They don’t want the people involved.


26 posted on 07/22/2014 6:00:52 AM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Chuck prefers that the candidates be selected from a “qualified” list by the Leftist media-party, before the masses are allowed to pick between the red colored dog crap or the blue colored dog crap.

The Dems now have added this mantra about protecting the ability to govern into their lexicon. What it really means is that they resent the peoples’ ability to put checks on their actions.


27 posted on 07/22/2014 6:01:45 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Anything scumbag Schumer suggests is NOT for your benefit, it’s for his.

“Nonpartisan elections” gave us Mayor Anise Porker (Parker) in Houston who ramrodded through a sexual predator protection ordnance to allow trannies and predators to pick their bathrooms - and prey on your kids. Houstonians OVERWHELMINGLY oppose it. They give us communists self-described as moderates. They allow donors to hide behind their favored candidate’s “non partisan” status.

FOAD, Schumer.


28 posted on 07/22/2014 6:12:53 AM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

They don’t want opponents. They want to be ordained and crowned like Obama. So it is said, so it shall be.


29 posted on 07/22/2014 6:16:25 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

We already have a one party system. Whats his point?


30 posted on 07/22/2014 6:33:28 AM PDT by Breto (Stranger in a strange land... where did America go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
The broad road to single party totalitarianism.

We're pretty much there now.

31 posted on 07/22/2014 6:34:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

No one except for Zero has advocated for more harm to the public than Schumer, and in a saner world he’d have to explain himself to the FBI.


32 posted on 07/22/2014 6:46:24 AM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
“It has become a menace to governing.”

Translation: Elections are a menace to the ruling class.

33 posted on 07/22/2014 7:06:19 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
For some reason libs - or marxists in this case - are great at taking tests.

Or elections, or anything else you can cheat at.

34 posted on 07/22/2014 7:08:12 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson