Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. judge rules California death penalty system unconstitutional
Reuters ^ | July 16, 2014 | by Sharon Bernstein

Posted on 07/16/2014 3:44:34 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2014 3:44:34 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There is a lot of unconstitutional all of a sudden


2 posted on 07/16/2014 3:46:02 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Carney, Cormac J.
Born 1959 in Detroit, MI

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Nominated by George W. Bush on January 7, 2003, to a seat vacated by Carlos R. Moreno. Confirmed by the Senate on April 7, 2003, and received commission on April 9, 2003.

Education:
University of California, Los Angeles, B.A., 1983
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1987

Professional Career:
Private practice, California, 1987-2001
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 2001-2003


3 posted on 07/16/2014 3:46:59 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

The Constitution is unconstitutional.


4 posted on 07/16/2014 3:47:06 PM PDT by Crazieman (Are you naive enough to think VOTING will fix this entrenched system?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

5 posted on 07/16/2014 3:47:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So, the black-robed oligarchs tie up executions for years, and even decades, and then decide that such a long process is cruel and unusual.

Personally, I think letting people like this sit on the bench is cruel and unusual punishment on We the People.


6 posted on 07/16/2014 3:47:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I can't help it. I was born again this way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Insanity masquerading as judicial opinion! Because the appeals process has been delayed by defendants’ lawyers to save the life of those convicted and sentenced to die, making them wait that long to be executed is cruel!


7 posted on 07/16/2014 3:52:53 PM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
John Roberts and Cormac J. Carney, both Bush appointees.

Wises choices?

8 posted on 07/16/2014 3:53:11 PM PDT by South40 (Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

I was just going to say this was another Bush appointee.

Ya beat me to it.


9 posted on 07/16/2014 3:56:37 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I suspect this is leftists opening up a new front against the US. The death penalty has always been the “twin brother” of gun liberty, and leftists do not want America to have either.

The very best way to streamline the death penalty may soon come our way, with conservatives as chairmen of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees. Among things they can do:

1) Declare states to be “competent authorities” to carry out the death penalty as they see fit, without repeated intrusion into their means by death penalty opposed federal judges.

2) Move all death penalty appeals to the head of the federal court docket, so there are no longer years of delay just to hear an appeal.

3) Limit continuances during the appeal process to 1 month each for the defense, the prosecution, and at the discretion of the judge. Total 3 months.

4) Restrict when and how federal judges can overturn a death penalty, with a judicial bias to return the case to the trial court to reconsider, not with instructions to acquit.

5) Suggest to the individual states that there is much they can do as well to streamline the process, like changing the law so that a government can only commute or pardon on the recommendation of the state board of pardons and paroles. And to allow the firing squad as an alternative means of execution, as it is much harder to appeal.


10 posted on 07/16/2014 3:59:32 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

He was appointed to the superior court by Grey Davis. Bush apparently thought he deserved a higher position.


11 posted on 07/16/2014 4:00:11 PM PDT by South40 (Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South40

He did real good, so Bush promoted him...


12 posted on 07/16/2014 4:01:45 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I guess Bush thought the same of Roberts, the result is we now have Obamacare.


13 posted on 07/16/2014 4:03:12 PM PDT by South40 (Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Another corrupt judge writing law based on his personal political opinion. Oh how the USA needs to demote them to outhouse duty.


14 posted on 07/16/2014 4:03:35 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
WTF????

The black robed educated idiots created the delays to begin with. Lock up all the judges and lawyers with all the killers and murderers in a dark sealed concrete room and leave knives, bats, and all manner of sharp and lethal hand instruments in the room and let the best man survive. Than wash rinse and repeat with the next group until none are left. Or just take them out back and hang them all now.

15 posted on 07/16/2014 4:04:34 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

BINGO...


16 posted on 07/16/2014 4:23:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Think how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are stupider than that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How can it be unconstitutional? It has nothing to do with the Constitution. Just shoot the murderer and be done with it.
I know Jerry Brown has been releasing 10’s of thousands of criminals so he must be happy with this ruling.


17 posted on 07/16/2014 4:31:45 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Actually, in a perverse way, he’s right. We should have a process that limits appeals of death penalty sentences. Here in California more condemned people die in our prisons of old age that by carrying out the sentences that the original court handed down. There needs to be an expedited process lasting no more than a year where ALL appealable issues are brought up and adjudicated, and either the sentence vacated or carried out.


18 posted on 07/16/2014 4:35:37 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The liberal courts threw out the DP previously.

The legislature re-wrote the law and by a majority put it back in place.

The liberal courts turn it into a delay game.

Another judge says that since in practice it is a delay game, it is not capable of being applied in an even and sensible manner.

The mistake happens when instead of ruling the appeals and delay processes in the courts have to change — his branch — he throws out a law the legislature passed.

A sensible legislature would re-craft the law yet again and limit the judicial review process. But, it topsy turvy land where the electorates representative can’t write law of the land, the courts would claim they can’t be limited.

The public just sits back and says wasn’t Jeter’s final appearance just great and what about those crazy Khardasian girls?


19 posted on 07/16/2014 4:41:29 PM PDT by KC Burke (Gowdy for Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

I’ve sent this to three governors of Cal.

We have over 300 on death row. They even built a new death row to handle the number. The cost is at least 30 million for housing alone. So I estimate appeals and everything at $40 million.

We have 20 or less sentences a year. Here’s a plan to get rid of the backlog and return it to a sensible system. The goal is to handle up the 25 executions a year after the back log is cut down.

Set up 3 panels of 3 judges each. Within a year of being convicted, your appeal is heard by one of these panels. The appeal from those panels is within one year of conviction (no more than 90 days after hearing). The appeal is to the US circuit and then the US supreme court. No more appeals at the state level unless new evidence or corruption of the trial process.

Total time no more than 5 years.

After 5 years, schedule 1 execution per week until the back log is taken care of.

Th cost of 9 judges, clerks, defense attorneys, prosecutors, should be well under 0 million a year, an annual savings of $30 million after the fourth year.


20 posted on 07/16/2014 4:50:55 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Advanced technological development.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson