Posted on 07/15/2014 9:28:58 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Cambridge, Mass. (CBS CONNECTICUT) NASA predicts that 100 million worlds in our own Milky Way galaxy may host alien life, and space program scientists estimate that humans will be able to find life within two decades.
Speaking at NASAs Washington headquarters on Monday, the space agency outlined a plan to search for alien life using current telescope technology, and announced the launch of the Transiting Exoplanet Surveying Satellite in 2017. The NASA administrators and scientists estimate that humans will be able to locate alien life within the next 20 years.
Just imagine the moment, when we find potential signatures of life. Imagine the moment when the world wakes up and the human race realizes that its long loneliness in time and space may be over the possibility were no longer alone in the universe, said Matt Mountain, director and Webb telescope scientist at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, which plans to launch the James Webb Space Telescope in 2018.
What we didnt know five years ago is that perhaps 10 to 20 per cent of stars around us have Earth-size planets in the habitable zone, added Mountain. Its within our grasp to pull off a discovery that will change the world forever.
(Excerpt) Read more at connecticut.cbslocal.com ...
The sightings were up close and personal. And it wasn't swamp gas because most folks around here are quite familiar with swamp gas (the famous Cogdell Light is only perhaps 25 miles away and EVERYONE back in the 60's had seen it).
Baloney.
Calc how many star systems the radio signals have hit. It should be in the millions by now. Then calc how many systems the evos say should have life.
By the evo math, the Vulcans would have been here a long time ago, answering our “phone home”.
Why aren’t they here yet?
BECAUSE THEY DON’T EXIST!!!
You’re argument is with known facts. Mathematics is not baloney and neither is the speed of light which radio transmissions travel at or near.
No, we put on a gorilla suit with red reflectors glued on by the eye holes and run across roads late at night.
Imagine how much fun that would be on a planet that had no gorillas! ;^)
Freedom ≠ Free Stuff☭ | ||
I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Overlords /. | ||
|
Their assumption seems to be that 10% of stars have planets in the habitable zone and 1% of those planets support life.
The problem is that there is no reason to plump for 1%, as opposed to 10%, .000001% or zero. None at all. Percentage just picked out of the air.
Other calculations put the number of solar systems within 100 light years of earth at about 170,000. Still a far cry from millions. 100 light years is a good measure because the oldest radio signal from earth has traveled about 110 light years. How Far Have Our Radio Signals Traveled From Earth? The other problem is also addressed at that last link...
While its interesting to imagine how far our radio signals have traveled into space, its extremely unlikely that an alien civilization will be able to catch the latest episode of I Love Lucy. This is thanks to the inverse square law. In Laymans term, its a form of signal degradation.As radio signals leave earth, they propagate out in a wave form. Just like dropping a stone in a lake, the waves diffuse or spread out over distance thanks to the exponentially larger area they must encompass. The area can be calculated by multiplying length times width which is why we measure it in square units square centimeters, square miles, etc. This means that the further away from the source, the more square units of area a signal has to illuminate.
In addition you have to figure the odds of life being present in any given solar system and the number drops a lot from that 170k. Then figure in the odds of that life being intelligent and technologically capable of "listening" for radio transmissions and it is narrowed down to some small fraction of a percentage point.
"There are a total of 115 stars in 81 star systems within 20 light years from the Earth."
But no calculation about 100 light years containing 170K stars.
A few years ago the Hipparcos sattelite measured distances to ~120,000 nearby stars, so somewhere there is an exact answer to this question. I don't know to what magniture Hipparcos could measure parallaxes for, and whether it could see the dimmest M dwarfs 100 light years away, so it may or may not have observed all the stars within 100 light years. Given how dim M dwarfs are, I would guess it probably didn't. In other words, somewone probably figured out exactly how many stars in the Hipparcos catalog are withi 100 lightyears, but I don't know that answer, or whether that ould be all of the actual stars within 100 lightyears (~30 parsecs). So, here's an estimate. In our part of the Galaxy, the average distance between stars is about 1 parsec. (30 PC~100 ly). 4pi/3* (30 PC)^3 is about 113,000 stars out to a distance of 30 PC or about 100 lightyears. Now, about half of the star systems are binaries or multiple systems, so 113000 + 113000/2 is about 170,000 stars. That's a lot! As for how many have planets, well, we have detected several hundred extrasolar planets, but they are almost all very large planets orbiting very close to their parent star, simply because this is what is easiest to detect. The more we look, the more we'll probably find, so there are probably many thousands of planets within 100 ly of our solar system.
The most "Earth-like" planet ever discovered is the planet Venus. It is almost exactly the same size as Earth and close to the same orbit. If you were looking at it from several light years away it would be virtually indistinguishable from Earth.
So, if there’s other life elsewhere the next question would be does it matter to us, them, or neither?
With all that troubles the world today does it matter?
I cannot help but feel the vastness of the universe reflects the vastness of our non-understanding of God. When I am with God he will clue me in on some things. I look forward to it.
Thanks, missed that. The 170K number is a bit disingenuous as it counts binaries as two systems. And if you want to pretend to count M dwarfs...
Like Global Cooling predictions in the 70’s, warming in the 90’s...who will remember this prediction when it doesn’t pan out?
You listed several of them. Without a large moon and a molten core, Earth would look a lot like Venus.
In addition, there are many aspects of our solar system that may make it unique for the formation of life. For example, there have not been any large supernovas nearby that would have sterilized any newly formed or forming life with high levels of radiation.
Then, if you get simple life, it may take several world wide catastrophic events (like asteroid strikes and repeated ice ages) to keep resetting life until something complex is forced to evolve.
So even if we someday discovery microbial life somewhere else in our solar system, it doesn't necessarily mean that there is life (simple or complex life) in other solar systems.
The list is probably endless.
The source wasn’t trying to answer the question of how many stable solar systems with planets there are but it was one of the few sites I could find in a simple search that had some answer as to how many stars are within 100 lys of earth. It’s clearly a lot less than “millions.”
Threads like this always prompt me to remind FReepers to read Michael Crichton’s critical assessment of the Drake Equations....
Not only that, but they communicate using CB radios!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.