This is what’s really scary:
“The danger to America is not Barry-boy 0bummer, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an 0bummer presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Barry-boy 0bummer, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack 0bummer, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.”
This might not be be fixable.
I understand and to some extent, the throngs of ‘entitled’ will be a problem. Any given urban area is three or four days away from disaster if not replenished. When the deliveries stop and the EBTs don’t get recharged, there will be massive rioting.
But they can’t riot everywhere. And that is where separation, preparedness and self-protection comes in.
As opposed to the multitude of fools supposedly on the other side, who made Romney their president? Who if he won would enact the same tyrannical agenda from homosexual marriage to global warming to nationalized health care to abortion to immigration to gun control?
Americans are smarter than that and it is why more and more of them are staying home on election day. Leftists are the minority in America; it is why they have to cheat, and they do. They even cheat in the Republican party, as we saw in Mississippi. For their candidates to get in office, they have to cheat because they are the minority.
Americans are smart enough to know that they're being deprived of an option at the ballot box. They are smart enough to know that a choice between a Democrat and a Romney or even a Perry is sadly laughable. (Sorry, Perry supporters, but show where Perry has shown real proclivity for core limited government in concept, as have Palin and Cruz; what role does Texas government have in the sex lives of public high school students? I know it seems like a single-issue thing, but a guy that thinks government has any role, let alone one that would push medical immunizations benefitting pharmaceuticals, is obviously missing a core concept of limited government) --
-- in any case, Americans are smarter than that. I remember Perot, I remember how excited his followers, whom I thought misguided at the time, were to vote for him. I voted for the Republican, dogged in the faith that the Republican would advocate for less government. "Read my lips."
Clinton won twice, though a majority opposed him both times, and he was steamrolled by the Republican Revolution and then impeached. A plurality win was good for conservatism, at least as good as if "Read my lips" or good ol' Dole had won.
I'm older and wiser and so are a whole helluva lotta legitimate, real Americans. Not the harvested, faked, dead, multiple, illegal, and ginned Democrat figments of imagination, but real Americans.
That's what I see, and I don't know if it's scary so much as it is .. . well, heartening. I do believe in America, and I do believe that at heart, we are "Do unto others as I would have them do unto me" kinds of folks prepared to lovingly illuminate the paths of intelligent, angry, but Freedom-loving American yutes brainwashed by government schools usurped by a liberal minority. We have all the ingredients in place. No cake walk, but nothing worthwhile is.