To: Elsie
It began with #99. The situation is far more complicated and more evil (on Obmam’s part) than I had time to respond to earlier.
175 posted on
07/12/2014 2:21:07 PM PDT by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: SumProVita
Should have been OBAMA’S part...
176 posted on
07/12/2014 2:22:45 PM PDT by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: SumProVita
Your reasoning might have begun will #99 but it did not answer THIS question:
Are Beck and Company Funding Lawlessness in the Name of Jesus
199 posted on
07/12/2014 4:57:00 PM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson