Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bestintxas

Event one will be the extended Panama Canal opening...which ought to take at least fifty percent of the dock business on the west coast.

Event two will be the eventual Nicaragua Canal opening (probably 2025, I’m guessing), and that will cut more into the port business of California, Portland, and Seattle.

If you were a dock worker on the west coast....I’d pretty much start putting the house up for sale, and try to get the union to move me into Texas. Then I’d have to assume a forty-percent pay-cut somewhere down the line. It won’t be a happy environment, and tax revenue will be drastically affected within the next five years. California just doesn’t have much luck on jobs.


2 posted on 07/10/2014 5:31:10 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice
I’d have to assume a forty-percent pay-cut

To go with the cost of living reduction moving from Los Angeles, California to Texas City, Texas.

3 posted on 07/10/2014 5:33:34 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice
Event two will be the eventual Nicaragua Canal opening (probably 2025, I’m guessing), and that will cut more into the port business of California, Portland, and Seattle

The Panama expansion has removed most of the need for a new canal so I'd be surprised if it is even built. As for Texas, I don't recall any talk about excess capacity at the port of Houston or other ports, so unless the shipping companies start now to expand facilities then goods will continue to go to California to avoid the bottleneck in Texas.

8 posted on 07/10/2014 5:42:18 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice
A lot of this is complete nonsense. I say this as someone who works in transportation consulting and is very familiar with the dynamics of global shipping as it relates to the U.S. Just a couple of facts to keep in mind:

1. Port authority officials all up and down the East Coast have been advised for several years now to take these predictions of port growth related to the Panama Canal with a grain of salt when they make their investment decisions. A big part of this is Item #2 below.

2. A customer on the East Coast who pays a shipping line to move cargo from Asia to the U.S. isn't going to jump at the opportunity to save $100 on the cost of shipping a 40-foot container by routing it through the Panama Canal if it takes 7-8 days longer than moving the same container to the East Coast via Los Angeles/Long Beach and a cross-country railroad move.

3. Early this spring, the Port of Long Beach just had a port call from one of the newest container ships that is used in the shipping industry today. That ship is too big to fit through the Panama Canal -- the expanded Panama Canal, that is.

4. When you put all of these factors together, what you find is that a trip from Asia to the eastern U.S. through the West Coast and on the U.S. rail network is still going to be faster and more cost-effective even with the wider Panama Canal.

29 posted on 07/10/2014 6:55:46 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice
California just doesn’t have much luck on jobs...

"They'll always have their whores."


34 posted on 07/10/2014 11:58:10 AM PDT by The Duke ("Forgiveness is between them and God, it's my job to arrange the meeting.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson