Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit... So I will dumb it down for you. The congress has the power of the purse as well as complete authority over the laws of immigration. It is more likely that this congress would defund... That is one of the solutions provided by the constitution another is trough the courts.
You still have not cited where the constitution REQUIRES impeachment. It does not and you can not twist it to make it so. You claim to want to follow the law but won’t even do so yourself.
Yes I want the constitution to be used... There are many ways it can be
I read just fine thanks. I understand you keep avoiding a simple yes no answer because you lose either way. Say yes and your argument falls apart.
The purse has nothing to do with HCAM. Cite one reference where in light of HCAM one is to defund the president.
Cite one reference where in light of HCAM the congress is to do ANYTHING but impeach.
One.
I’ll wait.’
Strange. For years everyone on FR was solid on what impeachment was and how it was used. Now it’s all new!
Just like 2012 when since its creation, we all knew that pushing for an abortion funding, pro gay socialist was an absurd notion.
Then many did that very thing.
How very odd these big turnabouts happen at the most convenient times.
“Yes I want the constitution to be used... There are many ways it can be.”
I’m no history expert, but I think FDR found many of his New Deal policies found “illegal” by the Supreme Court near the end. And I believe that the senate or house (or both?) switched to Republican hands and they started to vote against his New Deal policies. And some historians cite THOSE changes with getting us out of the Depression, and not the often cited World War II.
And we have already seen how the Supreme Court has ruled against obama on numerous recent topics.