Posted on 07/09/2014 4:21:22 PM PDT by kingattax
Edited on 07/09/2014 5:18:04 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Shoes with President Obama
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
WHO bought the shoes? WHO is promoting this travesty?
“This is your best/worst photo?”
No, it’s just a recent photo from that I was able to search up of the detention facilities. If you have some better photo, let’s have a look.
“It is not about the shoes. IT IS ABOUT 90,000 CHILDREN traveling over 1,000 miles without their parents and an INVATION through the children to have the parents moved into the our Country!”
Well, this thread IS about the shoes... you are talking about the shoes and assuming someone bought these shoes as if that is relevant or means anything, so yes, that is about the shoes.
No offense but The pics I saw were at the border. You can live in your “let’s be forgiving world” I do not. We have gotten several planeloads here. I am seriously worried about my relatives in the Public school system! They are still to this day patting themselves on their backs for voting for this as2 @ipe twice!!!!
Ya can’t fix stoooooopid.
I suppose supplying the onvading horde with HOPE T-Shirts would have been a bit over the edge.......
“No offense but The pics I saw were at the border.”
Okay, you wouldn’t happen to have a link so that we can all see them, would you?
“You can live in your “let’s be forgiving world” I do not.”
Huh? Who said that? It was not me.
Ok, you keep your focus on shoes (or the ground). You have not answered one of my questions. Even with a new pair of shoes. WHO sends their children thousand of miles without supervision? WHO will tie the kiddies shoe laces? WHO is going to keep them from tripping because they can’t tie their own SHOE laces.
You still (as I do not either) don’t know, WHO bought the SHOES???
I am horribly untalented at the internet so , in truth, I am incapable of doing so.
The pics are here, they were at the border, and the fact that this whole thing was a set up is clear.
I wish I were more savvy, but I am not as far as posting goes.
deleted my pings, I am unable to give you a link but we were here on FR.
Pics at today’s www.dailycaller.com
“Ok, you keep your focus on shoes...”
Yes, I will, that’s what the thread is about.
“You have not answered one of my questions. Even with a new pair of shoes. WHO sends their children thousand of miles without supervision? WHO will tie the kiddies shoe laces? WHO is going to keep them from tripping because they can’t tie their own SHOE laces.”
What is the point of answering these irrelevant questions that have nothing to do with the article or what people are assuming based on the article?
“You still (as I do not either) don’t know, WHO bought the SHOES???”
No, but why does that matter? Or, even better, why does it matter any more than who bought the other illegal kids’ shoes that don’t have Obama logos on them? What exactly do you think can be accomplished by speculating about who bought 2 (out of tens of thousands) of illegals’ shoes?
“The pics are here, they were at the border, and the fact that this whole thing was a set up is clear.”
When you say “at the border”, were these pics of people actually crossing the border dressed in these clothes, or were they pictures taken at the detention facilities near the border?
Having three young males in my family, and buying Nike’s regularly (they do last longest) ...it is about 2-3 years unless in the fast growth stage for feet. All played sports.
Personally, I don’t worry about people who voted for Obama. Even those who’ve seen the light. Because in the next election the light will go off and they’ll vote for another liberal.
Personally, I do. Ignorance is bliss, but Tb is a Whole ‘nother tiger!
I guess I should have said I don’t CARE about people who voted for Obama. They get what they deserve.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.