Ok, you keep your focus on shoes (or the ground). You have not answered one of my questions. Even with a new pair of shoes. WHO sends their children thousand of miles without supervision? WHO will tie the kiddies shoe laces? WHO is going to keep them from tripping because they can’t tie their own SHOE laces.
You still (as I do not either) don’t know, WHO bought the SHOES???
“Ok, you keep your focus on shoes...”
Yes, I will, that’s what the thread is about.
“You have not answered one of my questions. Even with a new pair of shoes. WHO sends their children thousand of miles without supervision? WHO will tie the kiddies shoe laces? WHO is going to keep them from tripping because they can’t tie their own SHOE laces.”
What is the point of answering these irrelevant questions that have nothing to do with the article or what people are assuming based on the article?
“You still (as I do not either) don’t know, WHO bought the SHOES???”
No, but why does that matter? Or, even better, why does it matter any more than who bought the other illegal kids’ shoes that don’t have Obama logos on them? What exactly do you think can be accomplished by speculating about who bought 2 (out of tens of thousands) of illegals’ shoes?