Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Sides With Christian College In Birth Control Case [Sotomayor Goes Berserk]
Washington Post ^ | July 03, 2014 | ROBERT BARNES

Posted on 07/03/2014 10:17:29 PM PDT by Steelfish

Supreme Court Sides With Christian College In Birth Control Case

The three female justices say their colleagues are reversing themselves from this week’s Hobby Lobby ruling. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) BY ROBERT BARNES July 3

The three female justices of the Supreme Court sharply rebuked their colleagues Thursday for siding with a Christian college in the latest battle over providing women with contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act, saying the court was retreating from assurances offered only days ago.

In a short, unsigned opinion, the court said that Wheaton College in Illinois, at least temporarily, does not have to comply even with compromise provisions in the law that the college says still violate its religious beliefs.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the action cast doubt on the very accommodation the court’s majority seemed to endorse Monday in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, which concerned businesses that objected to providing birth control that offends the owners’ beliefs.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christiancolleges; christians; hobbylobby; hobbylobbydecision; prolife; sotomayor; wheatoncollege
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2014 10:17:29 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

that’s the whole point of a case-by-case basis.

if they’re pissed why did they hear the case?


2 posted on 07/03/2014 10:21:31 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Leftists just love coercion, so much so that thwarting it is seen as a violation of their own freedom.


3 posted on 07/03/2014 10:23:07 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sotomayor disagreed. She said the injunction “risks depriving hundreds of Wheaton’s employees and students of their legal entitlement to contraceptive coverage.”

Oh, they’re so entitled, aren’t they, Mrs. Wise Latina... how did this idiot get onto the court? Same way as Kagan I expect.

Thank God this was put on hold. Total fascism.


4 posted on 07/03/2014 10:26:55 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

She is only wise when snacking on Wise potato chips.


5 posted on 07/03/2014 10:32:35 PM PDT by Zenjitsuman (New Boss Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Oh boo hop. The justices are following standard procedure and law for allowing a non-inmposition while awaiting further decisions.


6 posted on 07/03/2014 10:35:22 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Jeeze, don’t count your chickens....


7 posted on 07/03/2014 10:36:23 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Unfortunately the dam holding back the dam* fascism consists of only five men, two of whom are in their late 70’s, and two of whom are squishy.

The executive and the bureaucracy are shot. The number of principled men in the legislative branch with decent principles is weepable or laughable depending on one’s proclivities. The end is not yet, but it looks to be in sight.


8 posted on 07/03/2014 10:39:21 PM PDT by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
Oh, they’re so entitled, aren’t they, Mrs. Wise Latina... how did this idiot get onto the court? Same way as Kagan I expect.

Well, they are affirmative action appointees by an affirmative action POTUS.
9 posted on 07/03/2014 10:48:51 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-1938 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

Your analysis is sadly correct. ANY pro-American decision can be overturned at any time. We thought we’d effectively beat the Sodomy lobby after Bowers V Harwick, but then we saw the disgusting Lawrence V Texas case.

I have seen the presumed nominees Obama is thinking of for the SCOTUS (all of whom are women), one is the dumbass senator from Minnesota and the other a Marxist Californian black supremacist.

Now, I personally don’t see him getting these opportunities, because Ginsburg is resistant to retiring, and despite how pathetic the Repukes are, they are likely to take the senate.... but let’s remember that 2016 is a horrible year for Republicans in terms of senate opportunities, and the establishment will force another moderate slime to lose another presidential election.

These are the worst of times, and we need the 2nd Amendment now more than ever. The Democrats have become an openly socialist anti-constitutional party, and we have heard the threats from all their chosen constituencies whether its Farakhan’s promise to curb-stomp blue eyed babies, Dan Savage’s desire to rape conservatives, or that Climatard’s promise to throw enemies in jail, we are years away from a French-style ‘Great Terror’.

When you tell your children about America, tell them it is right now under attack.


10 posted on 07/03/2014 10:49:20 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

Good points.

Very shaky situation. Though the MSM keeps spinning it to set up the ‘war on women’ false narrative, this is requiring Christians to provide free abortions for employees.

ABORTION is never mentioned in any media coverage. It’s ‘contraception’ or ‘reproductive health rights.’

No.

It’s Christians being legally required to kill unborn children or being allowed not to kill unborn babies.


11 posted on 07/03/2014 10:49:24 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Perhaps an aside, but conservatives have simply got to stop reading and quoting from the leftest lexicons. Abortion (in all of it's current renderings) is murder. It is the willful taking of another life. We need to stop playing into the left's program by reading from, and agreeing with their verbiage.

Dumbed-down low information voters need simple language they can understand.

12 posted on 07/03/2014 10:58:24 PM PDT by The Citizen Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
legal entitlement to contraceptive coverage.”

And it deprives me of my "legal entitlement" not to have to pay for someone else's "legal entitlement".

You want something, then pay for it yourself!

13 posted on 07/03/2014 11:59:11 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

No one is denying access to birth control you nit wit latina.


14 posted on 07/04/2014 12:12:55 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Hey! its WAAAYCIST to challenge the wise latina... she knows the law, unlike stupid gringos!


15 posted on 07/04/2014 12:14:09 AM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I highly doubt that she even passed the Bar. She is affirmative Action all the way!


16 posted on 07/04/2014 12:16:22 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Steelfish

The ability to not pay for services not wanted nor needed should extend right down to the individual.


19 posted on 07/04/2014 12:43:34 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

When has there ever bean a right to free birth control/abortions?

Never, the lib idiots just made it up.

Now they’re crying because some won’t go along with it in order to protect a true constitutional right— freedom of religion.

Oh noes its a war on WOOOOOMEN! /s

These people are nothing but modern day stalinists.


20 posted on 07/04/2014 1:42:25 AM PDT by Cubs Fan (liberalism is a cancer that destroys everything it gets control of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson