I watched all today’s testimony. The policies are, along with, “financial difficulties” are motives according to the detective. What isn’t written in the newspapers is one was through his work and $2k Many companies have free policies as a benefit. That said they did buy $25k. I bought $20K for all my kids.
More disturbing is the detectives TESTIMONY for prosecution they said the couple had “financial difficulties”. On cross his TESTIMONY was shown to be without merit. No bank statements no collections NOTHING. ONLY THE DETECTIVE INTENTIONALLY MISINTERPRETING A QUESTION ABOUT “financial difficulty” to the wife and her answer “ no more than any other couple” as verified financial difficulty. He was ridiculous and combatively equivocating.
This tells me the detective and CCPD developed the theory and have only presented real evidence and putting of anything they can’t or won’t answer with “we have not reviewed all the evidence”
There is a lot more wrong with the case I saw. It will all come out after full discovery. I predict they won’t make premeditated felony murder stick
Get real.....they will and SHOULD FRY!!
...I agree that everybody has financial difficulties..
..I agree that a $25,000 life insurance on a baby was probably very cheap and the come ons are that you buy it when the baby is little and they get to have it cheaply up until adulthood...we've all seen the ads...