Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

Well, there is that, OK.

I’m referring to the ruling. HL was not opposed to “contraception” like the left is trying to say,
but opposed to providing abortifacients.

They need to be corrected every time they conflate the two, so they have to defend their support of baby killing.


22 posted on 06/30/2014 11:36:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
They need to be corrected every time they conflate the two, so they have to defend their support of baby killing.

Good point. I observed earlier today that the point of all this is to establish a "right" to free abortion.

44 posted on 06/30/2014 11:47:13 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I don't feel obligated to provide you with a non-boring gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson