Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2014 7:13:31 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes!


2 posted on 06/30/2014 7:15:00 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The Supreme Court says public sector unions can’t collect fees from home health care workers who object to being affiliated with a union. The justices on Monday said collecting the fees violates the First Amendment rights of workers who are not union members....”

So will the co criminals, Herrs Obozo and Holder ignore this like they ignore any law or court ruling that goes against their agenda or contributors?


3 posted on 06/30/2014 7:15:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Herr Obozo, the Sunni Won-Doer, will not divert $'s from his war on Americans to help our Veterans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Very scary that four justices said yes they can.


4 posted on 06/30/2014 7:16:22 AM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Man, that cripples up union forced membership. I don’t see how long-term survival is possible now with the unions.


6 posted on 06/30/2014 7:16:26 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This represents the death knell to public sector unions, something that even Franklin Roosevelt could not stomach. The unholy alliance of unions and Democrat politicians has worked against good government, fiscal responsibility, and the will of the people. A good day.


7 posted on 06/30/2014 7:16:57 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What was the voting split?


10 posted on 06/30/2014 7:20:15 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

the O-hole in chief child will ignore this order. And he will lambaste the Court. “Don’t doubt me on this.”


14 posted on 06/30/2014 7:20:49 AM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; BuckeyeTexan; 1010RD

Very good news. Abood was not overturned but this is a defeat to the union progressive plan.


15 posted on 06/30/2014 7:20:51 AM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

FLAHS ALERT:

HOBBY LOBBY WINS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


18 posted on 06/30/2014 7:21:37 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Does this mean that Rush Limbaugh can quit paying dues, or leave the union entirely?


19 posted on 06/30/2014 7:21:47 AM PDT by ansel12 (( Rand Paul---What a tragedy if America wouldn't have gotten to see Barack Obama as a leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Great win I thought the SC would come through!! Even they were appalled by the thieving money grubbing union thugocracy


20 posted on 06/30/2014 7:22:53 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This will kick the public sector unions right in the nuts!

Yea USSC!


21 posted on 06/30/2014 7:23:28 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I thought I heard on the radio that PART-TIME members COULD NOT be compelled, but FULL-TIME workers COULD. Did anyone else hear that?


24 posted on 06/30/2014 7:27:57 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Terrible false headline.

Only applies to certain “partial” public employees.
It’s a “partial” win, which is better than any loss though.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-681_j426.pdf


26 posted on 06/30/2014 7:31:31 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

27 posted on 06/30/2014 7:33:57 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

SCOTUS ruled on the specific Illinois program at issue ... unions can still collect dues from other public workers.

This is NOT a real victory against public employee unions.


29 posted on 06/30/2014 7:46:48 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonevoice

Another win for the good guys.


30 posted on 06/30/2014 7:49:49 AM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

thank God.


31 posted on 06/30/2014 7:52:40 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So if the union negotiates a raise in their conract is the non-member exempt from the raise?


32 posted on 06/30/2014 7:54:43 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Obama Justice Department gets another loss as they had weighed in on the side of the public sector unions/state of Illinois. Solicitor General Verilli argued in an amicus curiae brief in 2012 that the USSC shouldn’t even hear the case.
http://www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2012/2pet/6invit/2011-0681.pet.ami.inv.pdf


34 posted on 06/30/2014 8:05:00 AM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson