To: HiTech RedNeck
No...Just someone who enjoys seeing Tea Partiers work themselves into a frenzy trying to justify another ass whipping at the polls. Not everyone on FR subscribes to the Tea Party. Some of us want to win elections instead of debating who’s the most conservative of the losing candidates.
To: OldRanchHand
Well it is Pyrrhic to win an election at the cost of becoming total mush.
15 posted on
06/28/2014 4:51:36 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: OldRanchHand
So YOU support RomneyCARE, RomneyMarriage,
Romney statism, and the new Polygamy,
and now beastiality of the GOP?
Or do YOU support the protection of Obama
afforded by the complicit GOP?
or do YOU support the EXEMPT GOP?
Yes. Yes. Yes, it seems.
Because the Tea Party says No. No. No.
To: OldRanchHand
LOL Ranch it was no ass whipping.
The primary was won by McDaniel. Did you forget? And there was chicanery in that election too.
This MS thing stinks as bad as the IRS thing. And you stink at your job as bad as the defenders of “not a smidgeon of corruption”.
zot
19 posted on
06/28/2014 5:08:46 AM PDT by
Principled
(Obama: Unblemished by success.)
To: OldRanchHand
> No...Just someone who enjoys seeing Tea Partiers work themselves into a frenzy trying to justify another ass whipping at the polls. Not everyone on FR subscribes to the Tea Party. Some of us want to win elections instead of debating whos the most conservative of the losing candidates
The Tea Party is bout much more than conservatism. It’s about putting the right people into office and kicking cronies and ogliarchs that represent big money and not The People to the curb. I bet you will find there to be more Tea Partiers than not on FR though.
To: OldRanchHand
29 posted on
06/28/2014 5:45:56 AM PDT by
Bratch
To: OldRanchHand
45 posted on
06/28/2014 7:45:50 AM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
To: OldRanchHand
Some of us want to win elections instead of debating whos the most conservative of the losing candidates.McDaniel won the Republican primary among Republicans. Anyone who says 'move on' is not willing to fight for honest elections.
46 posted on
06/28/2014 8:06:45 AM PDT by
Kenny
To: OldRanchHand
Enjoy your proliberal zot creampuff.
48 posted on
06/28/2014 9:06:01 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
To: OldRanchHand; TheOldLady; Darksheare
No...Just someone who enjoys seeing Tea Partiers work themselves into a frenzy trying to justify another ass whipping at the polls. You're cute.
49 posted on
06/28/2014 9:11:57 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
To: OldRanchHand
No...Just someone who enjoys seeing Tea Partiers work themselves into a frenzy trying to justify another ass whipping at the polls. Not everyone on FR subscribes to the Tea Party. Some of us want to win elections instead of debating whos the most conservative of the losing candidates.
A losing strategy continuously employed by Karl Rove.
Either win with principle, or go home.
51 posted on
06/28/2014 9:27:38 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: OldRanchHand
"Some of us want to win elections instead of debating whos the most conservative of the losing candidates." That begs the question...how badly do you want to win elections? Are you willing to do so at any cost? Willing to embrace evil positions? Lie to the electorate? Maliciously slander an opponent? Break election laws?
"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul?"
53 posted on
06/28/2014 10:47:22 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: OldRanchHand
56 posted on
06/28/2014 1:52:09 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson