I just can’t see that making a difference. If you prove illegal activity went on in a large enough quantity, the election result is in question regardless of who voted for who. The judge must call for a do-over of the runoff.
>>I just can’t see that making a difference. If you prove illegal activity went on in a large enough quantity, the election result is in question regardless of who voted for who. The judge must call for a do-over of the runoff.<<
If the DEM poll list actually verifies that they voted DEM, and not just that they voted in a particular election (and usually vote DEM, or they wouldn’t be on the DEM poll list), then illegal votes will be easy to verify. But I doubt that the DEM poll list verifies which party they voted for on June 3rd.
Again, the best resolution would be for Cochran (and his supporters) to come to their senses and realize the mess they’ve created here, and concede the election, and the argument. Otherwise, they’re as corrupt as the Democrats, and proving it.