>>I just can’t see that making a difference. If you prove illegal activity went on in a large enough quantity, the election result is in question regardless of who voted for who. The judge must call for a do-over of the runoff.<<
If the DEM poll list actually verifies that they voted DEM, and not just that they voted in a particular election (and usually vote DEM, or they wouldn’t be on the DEM poll list), then illegal votes will be easy to verify. But I doubt that the DEM poll list verifies which party they voted for on June 3rd.
Again, the best resolution would be for Cochran (and his supporters) to come to their senses and realize the mess they’ve created here, and concede the election, and the argument. Otherwise, they’re as corrupt as the Democrats, and proving it.
Yeah, like thats gonna happen. Can this not be in conjunction with the actual vote tallies from Hinds? (how many voted in the Democrat primary, how many voted in the Republican, then how many voted in the runoff, the increase in the rolls, etc)
When I vote in a primary here in NC I am given a Republican ballot since I’m a registered Republican. I can’t vote Democrat since I don’t have access to that ballot. If MS is the same, those Dem voters would HAVE to vote Dem.
A better resolution (if possible) is for Cochran to NOT come to his senses and a recount proves that Cochran won by fraud and that McDaniels is deemed the true winner. This would be better because it would expose the corruption of the RINOs and RNCe.
I don't want them to concede. I want them to be beaten and humiliated. (Of course this entire premise assumes a recount is allowed and is performed correctly without Cochran machinery corrupting the results)