To: beaversmom
Reckon it wasn’t fool-proff after all...
2 posted on
06/26/2014 11:26:25 AM PDT by
HiJinx
(People were created to be Loved; Things were created to be Used.)
To: HiJinx
3 posted on
06/26/2014 11:26:40 AM PDT by
HiJinx
(People were created to be Loved; Things were created to be Used.)
To: HiJinx
You can’t make it fool-proof because fools are too damn ingenious.
6 posted on
06/26/2014 11:27:11 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: HiJinx
Make the system fool-proof, and they’ll provide you with a bigger fool.
Eventually, you end up with Elanor Holmes-Norton in a driverless car ...
To: HiJinx
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
- Douglas Adams
34 posted on
06/26/2014 11:48:51 AM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: HiJinx
I appreciated the humor in your post. :)
TWB
To: HiJinx
Reckon it wasn’t fool-proff after all... Remember the old admonition that calling anything "fool-proof" merely serves to get the creative juices flowing among the fools. To wit, the present example.
On a related note, driverless cars are a fools program.
62 posted on
06/26/2014 3:38:43 PM PDT by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
To: HiJinx
Don’t let that whacko into a data center.
66 posted on
02/25/2017 10:40:14 AM PST by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson