Skip to comments.
UNANIMOUS! Supreme Court Rules Obama’s ‘Recess’ Appointments UNCONSTITUTIONAL
TPN ^
| 6/26/2014
| Matthew Burke
Posted on 06/26/2014 9:25:49 AM PDT by Marie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
There's a lot of good stuff out there today! 9-0! He broke the law.
1
posted on
06/26/2014 9:25:50 AM PDT
by
Marie
To: Marie
2
posted on
06/26/2014 9:27:56 AM PDT
by
Principled
(Obama: Unblemished by success.)
To: Marie
The Hero of Benghazi seems to be having some difficulty.
3
posted on
06/26/2014 9:28:33 AM PDT
by
morphing libertarian
( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Taliban, Fast and furious, VA, Benghazi)!!!)
To: Marie
Better put some ice on that Odungo.
4
posted on
06/26/2014 9:28:36 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: Marie
Expect the Dems to somehow create extended recesses under the next GOP Prez.
5
posted on
06/26/2014 9:29:11 AM PDT
by
Citizen Zed
("Freedom costs a buck o five" - Gary Johnston, TAWP)
To: Marie
WOO HOOOO .... and it's only THURSDAY^ !
PLENTY of time to get THIS out .... UNSPUN.
6
posted on
06/26/2014 9:32:16 AM PDT
by
knarf
(brooklyn bridge)
To: Marie
So when does his trial start? Or is the constitution not supposed to protect us from tyrants?
7
posted on
06/26/2014 9:32:23 AM PDT
by
thorvaldr
To: Principled
8
posted on
06/26/2014 9:32:23 AM PDT
by
Marie
(When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
To: Marie
He broke the law. Give him a fair trial and a fair sentence to be served in a federal prison.
9
posted on
06/26/2014 9:33:43 AM PDT
by
Gabrial
(The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
To: Citizen Zed
--
Expect the Dems to somehow create extended recesses under the next GOP Prez. --
I think you mean the reverse of that, absence of a recess results in absence of power to recess appoint.
The DEMs started the practice of phony Congressional session, so the books look as though Congress is in session (not in recess) when it is actually not in session. They'd keep two people in DC, one to sit in the high chair, and one to open and close the session. I think the average time of being in session was about 30 seconds.
SCOTUS punted this too. The president and Congress have been allowing unconstitutional recess appointments for over a hundred years. SCOTUS says, well, if it's been going on that long, "poof," it's constitutional.
10
posted on
06/26/2014 9:33:52 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Marie
Does this mean those he illegally “appointed” will be removed? I can’t wait to see that not happen.
11
posted on
06/26/2014 9:34:00 AM PDT
by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: thorvaldr
We have *got* to take everything this election. Unless we get back the Senate, they’ll never impeach.
On the other hand... Uncle Joe...
ug.
12
posted on
06/26/2014 9:34:03 AM PDT
by
Marie
(When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
To: Marie
9-0 on ANYTHING is pretty astonishing!
13
posted on
06/26/2014 9:34:04 AM PDT
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: Marie
If he chooses wrong on something that gets ruled 9-0, then we cannot trust his judgment on what a “smidgen” of corruption is.
14
posted on
06/26/2014 9:36:08 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
To: Marie
Obama could take a cue from President Lincoln or President Jackson and just IGNORE the US Supreme Court ... :-) ...
15
posted on
06/26/2014 9:37:19 AM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Marie
Something tells me even the libs on the court are starting to fear a dictatorship and the inevitable response from the People.
To: Marie
I think it takes 2/3 of the senate to remove the hero of Benghazi.
But the majority would be nice if just to tell Reid to sit down.
17
posted on
06/26/2014 9:38:01 AM PDT
by
morphing libertarian
( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Taliban, Fast and furious, VA, Benghazi)!!!)
To: precisionshootist
They’re contemplating what might happen with this power if a republican is elected president in a few years.
18
posted on
06/26/2014 9:38:46 AM PDT
by
kjam22
(my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
To: ryan71
I would assume that they all have to go.See if the republicans force the issue or not,may be Boner will want to cry about it first.
19
posted on
06/26/2014 9:41:08 AM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: Marie; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
20
posted on
06/26/2014 9:42:56 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson