There’s a reason why these Darwinists are so obsessed with proving that human DNA and chimpanzee DNA are similar (never mind that they are completely different barmaids).
If they are they can relax, the case was proven 10 years ago.
If they are they can relax, the case was proven 10 years ago.Are you referring to Oliver the Chimp? If so, then the Darwinist position would be that his features would be examples of a mutation (which it obviously is, it's just not a mutation which could be passed down like Darwinists claimed it could be). Darwinists are interested in the, err... more direct proof of human and ape DNA. Never mind that chimps have 48 chromosomes and humans only have 46, which should in itself disprove the ability to produce a man/monkey hybrid.
If you're referring to something else, I apologize for not knowing about that specific study.