Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thejokker

I think this is talking about situations where we don’t have proof that they are attacking anybody because their claimed action is not actually physically attacking. And there is no accountability. With Bergdahl, for instance, there was evidence that he was helping the enemy and evidence that he joined them voluntarily. If we had done a drone hit on him it would have been done through the military and there would have to be records on what was done - records which could be brought out in court-martial if somebody was accused of killing him wrongly. Obama is talking about no accountability, if I’m understanding correctly. It’s done in total secrecy unless Obama wants to brag about it publicly. The ones he doesn’t want anybody to know about - the ones that could be sheer political hits - can’t/won’t be disclosed, and nobody can do a thing about it. Just like US citizens the regime considers “belligerent” can be detained indefinitely with no charges filed, and nobody can get any information on what is going on. The regime gets to define “belligerent”. So maybe we better switch our discussions to include “Peace Be Upon Him” every time we use the name Obama, just to make sure we’re not labeled “belligerent” by the regime...

This might all seem academic to some, but to me this is real-time. How do I know that my friend who has gone missing hasn’t been offed by the regime? They could easily call him “belligerent” for helping me, and they’ve justified secretly offing people for that reason.

This issue cuts REALLY close to home. Keep in mind that this regime has labeled those who favor small government as “potential terrorists” who need close scrutiny...


48 posted on 06/25/2014 9:56:36 AM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

There are more valid reasons to seek impeachment than because of military actions. I can understand your concerns but I feel strongly it would set and equally dangerous precedent to force our military to conduct operations as a police force rather than as an Army. If an American wants to fight against American forces than I don’t want politics to determine whether he can be treated as any other enemy soldier.

If we can get control of the Senate than we can get rid of Barry for illegally by-passing congress.


50 posted on 06/25/2014 10:07:44 AM PDT by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson