Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

I disagree, if they are U.S. citizens, as apparently most are, they are entitled to due process and it appears they have not been. On its face, I see nothing wrong with this ruling and everything right.

Please correct me if I am wrong.


4 posted on 06/24/2014 11:52:57 AM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz

“I disagree, if they are U.S. citizens, as apparently most are, they are entitled to due process and it appears they have not been. On its face, I see nothing wrong with this ruling and everything right.

Please correct me if I am wrong.”

You are not wrong! I don’t want to fly with Muzzies either, but if they are citizens (Heaven Help Us for granting it), they should be afforded due process. It’s this “ if we told you we’d blow our cover, so we won’t” business that’s wrong.


5 posted on 06/24/2014 11:56:41 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

As a general rule, I’m always going to side AGAINST muzzies, the ACLU and liberal judges.

My guess is this article slanted the POV in favor of the poor muzzies.


8 posted on 06/24/2014 12:02:06 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

“I disagree, if they are U.S. citizens, as apparently most are, they are entitled to due process...”

The no fly list does not impose any fines on anyone, nor does it put anyone in prison.

A law must be clear, fair, and have a presumption of innocence to comply with procedural due process. However, if people engaged in certain activities are deemed too dangerous to allow on planes, and that rule is applied evenly, then it meets due process. It should not require a court order to prevent someone from getting on a plane.


13 posted on 06/24/2014 12:12:11 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Left wing. Right wing. One buzzard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz
I disagree, if they are U.S. citizens, as apparently most are, they are entitled to due process and it appears they have not been. On its face, I see nothing wrong with this ruling and everything right.

On the surface, I see the biggest issue being the stupid 'no fly list' in the first place. A list of names that may match anyone, and not unsurprisingly, has a number of aliases, and gosh, doesn't do a dang thing if someone provides fake documentation and flies under another name.

The entire concept is kabuki theater.

The opinion is correct, there should be a reasonable process to appeal, but the base concept, that the federal government should maintain or even be able to give permission for citizens to fly is in error.

18 posted on 06/24/2014 12:21:59 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

If they really have terrorist affiliations I suspect the due process would bear this out and they’d remain on the list.


22 posted on 06/24/2014 12:40:11 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz
I disagree, if they are U.S. citizens, as apparently most are, they are entitled to due process and it appears they have not been. On its face, I see nothing wrong with this ruling and everything right. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Better watch it citizen unit. Your unquestioning faith in the all-powerful state is suspect. Continued use of logic and reason will see you committed to the nearest camp.

32 posted on 06/24/2014 2:04:43 PM PDT by zeugma (It is time for us to start playing cowboys and muslims for real now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson