Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

...Michigan Department of Natural Resources...claims ow
nership over all Great Lakes shipwrecks in the state’s waters, although it acknowledges France would have rights to the Griffin because it was sailing under the authority of King Louis XIV.

**
Why would France still have rights to it after all of this time? Would it not be considered abandoned?


5 posted on 06/28/2014 6:12:13 PM PDT by Bigg Red (31 May 2014: Obamugabe officially declares the USA a vanquished subject of the Global Caliphate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bigg Red

“Why would France still have rights to it after all this time?”
Admiralty law. Basically government ownership trumps private ownership.


6 posted on 06/28/2014 6:36:07 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bigg Red

“Why would France still have rights to it after all of this time? Would it not be considered abandoned?”

See the following Webpage for the full story:

Sunken Warships and Military Aircraft
by J. Ashley Roach, Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State.
http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/org12-7j.htm

“Warships, naval auxiliaries, and other vessels owned or operated by a State and used at the time they sank only on government non-commercial service, are State vessels.8 Aircraft used in military, customs and police services are State aircraft.9 International law recognizes that State vessels and aircraft, and their associated artifacts, whether or not sunken, are entitled to sovereign immunity.10”


9 posted on 06/29/2014 5:19:18 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson