Separately, HRC would seem to have at least a superficial demographic advantage, because in the last several decades of presidential elections, it appears as if female voters outnumber males by about 52%-48%. Now why do so more men not vote when compared to women? Time was when politics was more of a men's thing, and most women voted pretty much the same way as their husband or boyfriend. Now we have a significant "gender gap" and it seems the leftist culture has deliberately castrated (figuratively) too many American men in the name of the feminist movement.
One antidote to HRC would be voter registration drives geared toward men.
Thanks js.
Apparently Hillary MRS CLINTON...as some serious heath issues not the least of which is now the headline on the Drudge Report.
“Hillary Has A Bad Heart”
I realise they meant it literally but it fits the figrartively ever so well
A “Blacker” Heart I cant imagine
Maybe the democracks will have to Run BELA PELOSI....or Mrs Bill DeBlasio/
Many more black males are in prison or unable to vote due to past felony convictions than their female counterparts. So even if the same percentage of qualified black males voted as black females, the female vote would surpass the male vote.
But is this also true for white, asian, and hispanic populations?
If pretty much all black voters will be voting Democrat then it doesn't really matter to the GOP whether black males vote more or less than black females.
What will really matter is whether there will be enough white male voters to counteract any sex-based voting nonsense.
The 600,000+ men who died in the Civil War may have believed they were fighting to preserve the Union or to defend their homes, or to defend Southern rights, or to free the slaves. None of them believed they were fighting for woman suffrage.
Some of the strongest opponents of woman suffrage in that era were women.
Women hate each other, I’d factor that in.