Yeah.....RIGHT!
We need to rid ourselves of the elitist ba$tards in both parties who think they are entitled to run our country into the ground.
Who in F-ck would want this old hag, dishonest , lying lesbian for president?
BS! It’s the media wish.
Separately, HRC would seem to have at least a superficial demographic advantage, because in the last several decades of presidential elections, it appears as if female voters outnumber males by about 52%-48%. Now why do so more men not vote when compared to women? Time was when politics was more of a men's thing, and most women voted pretty much the same way as their husband or boyfriend. Now we have a significant "gender gap" and it seems the leftist culture has deliberately castrated (figuratively) too many American men in the name of the feminist movement.
One antidote to HRC would be voter registration drives geared toward men.
Maybe. But the increasing questions about her health and the fact she will be 69 just one month before Election Day 2016 could trouble the electorate.
How many single mothers identify with HRC?
She is a woman. So most women will vote for her.
Identity politics.
The really scary thing is I have been reading some of the writings of a whack job named Alexander Dugin from Russia. SO far, we are following the playbook he spelled out in 1994. By playing off special interest groups to promote secession movements, Dugin hoped to split Europe with Germany, isolate China, and spread influence to Asia and the Middle East.
As bad as that is, there is one more thing Mr Dugin forgot to factor in. When all sides start playing identity politics, things get very bloody. Listening to Rush last week, I think that phase is about to start.
Yeah.....RIGHT!
We need to rid ourselves of the elitist ba$tards in both parties who think they are entitled to run our country into the ground.
Who in F-ck would want this old hag, dishonest , lying lesbian for president?