Posted on 06/20/2014 12:41:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I wonder if anyone has thought acquire the current hard drives of all those computers that supposedly crashed and verify their first use and that there are no files previous to the crash?
In an audit one is presumed to be guilty until proven innocent, right?
Perhaps the Committee can just consider All participants in this scheme guilty until they can prove they are innocent. Just consider them all convicted and....
(1) Ineligible for compensation, bonuses, or retirement of any kind.
(2) Incarcerate them all until such a time as they can be proven innocent. Make them share space with illegals at a de-commissioned military base - or there's always Club Gitmo (I understand there are 5 cells there that have just become available recently.)
Coughing up their "lost" emails would be a real fine place to start if they hope for acquittal.
Gazing up from that metal slab that passes for a bed in the klink, one would at least think they'd be incentivized to look for those emails don't you think?
FReegards!
RE: In an audit one is presumed to be guilty until proven innocent, right?
Yes, especially if you are being audited by the IRS.
I agree he owes no apologies.
But he, and every other person involved in this scandal, owes the taxpayers a pound of flesh.
The crows can have the rest of him.
It has to make one wonder if anyone in the IRS has mysteriously had a fatal fall, car accident, gone missing, etc. since this scandal broke?
You know, someone with knowledge (i.e., a potential whistleblower) that couldnt be trusted?
Think about it ..
That must be because he and the whole IRS truely need to be decimated.
Look it up, a legion was lined up and every 10th person...
See this is what happens when Congressional Republicans surrender to Obama the agencies they oversee don’t see them as overseerers to be feared.
The correct word is 'decapitated'. Not in the sense of the literal cutting off of heads, but rather in the sense of removal of ALL the top bureaucrats, however many that may be. Decapitation, here, has several particular advantages.
First, decapitation guarantees, effectively, that ALL the malefactors with any decision-making power in an organisation will be removed.
Second, post-decapitation, some number of underlings, now no longer under threat of retaliation from their bosses, will step forward -- even voluntarily, I should imagine -- and provide information necessary to the further cleaning up of the organisation in question.
Third, with a proper offer, to wit, "Hey, you fired a&&hole, want your job back?. Okay, come forward under oath and spill your guts.", even more information necessary to further clean-up will be garnered.
Fourth, other senior bureaucrats throughout the goobermint will unquestionably get the message more or less immediately that their, er, 'improved' behaviour is now imperatively important to their careers.
Fifth, the gross reduction of personnel accomplished by decapitation cannot but reduce overall goobermint spending. If accompanied by other measures, this reduction might become quite sizeable.
Sixth, decapitation will require some number of Senate confirmations, wherein (presumably, but certainly not a given considering the GOPe) proper and detailed vetting of nominees will be performed. No guarantee of success in keeping out new scumbags here, but at least it is a legitimate shot, and a net improvement in lowering the level of general scumbaggery in the organisation can hardly be avoided.
FReegards!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.