No, and you know better. Exigent circumstances BEYOND one’s control is a far cry from what she did. The argument is ludicrous.
It's not. The motorcyclist has to share some of the blame. If he's not capable of stopping for a woman who deliberately stopped then he wouldn't be able to stop for a disabled vehicle.
I think you guys want to punished more for stopping for a duck than the fact that a motorcyclist couldn't stop in time.