[nathanbedford]

Actually, the import of the article which I was at pains to point out was to identify the man's sin as violating political correctness: Evidently, to describe a woman as a skank is to violate the PC norm and, by inference, to accuse her of treason is not.

I thought this anomaly was worth pointing out and it distresses me that you think contrariwise. I do not understand how it is that skanks pose a greater threat to the survival of the Republic than traitors.

If traders do pose a greater threat, PC at least assures us that we will maintain a level of gentility as we decline. That is something we can hold fast to until the end.

[Valentine Michael Smith]

I understood your post. I am surprised that others did not.

The criticism of the lady’s husband is just the kind of lily liveried (sic) crap that has us in the shape we are in now. i.e. John McCain, “We have nothing to fear from and Obama presidency.”

The Democrats fight. The Republicans surrender. They fear the media. Anyway we will never win as long as we use the Marcus of Quisenberry rules.

By the way, Janet Nepalitno is a traitorous skank.