Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GailA

twisted thinking, no one will ever be able to prove what the buyer was thinking at the moment of purchase


2 posted on 06/17/2014 5:46:50 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

It might make purchase sales or exchanges of a gun after the first purchase illegal.

You won’t be able to inherit a gun collection.
Some may create a national gun registry using this.

Not good IMO.


15 posted on 06/17/2014 6:00:46 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Raise your hand if you are surprised to find out that the SCOTUS is just as corrupt as Congress and the President.

The SCOTUS entered no mans land for me a few years ago when they ruled it was OK to take property through eminent domain from one private party and give it to another private party. OH and the individual mandate is a tax. I forgot about that one.

Bottom line is who cares what the Supreme Court says anymore. If you want to buy a gun for someone just do it. The law is unenforceable anyway. Its time for a lot of civil disobedience.


40 posted on 06/17/2014 8:32:36 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson