Posted on 06/16/2014 2:59:04 AM PDT by RaceBannon
Mohamed Elibiary, a member on the Obama administration's Homeland Security Advisory Council, is at the center of a controversy involving allegations that former DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano gave him secret clearance which led to him downloading classified information. According to Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Elibiary later shopped that classified material around to a reporter. Elibiary, a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood who regularly goes after the Sisi led Egyptian government, is also an active participant on Twitter and mocked the "freak out" by U.S. talking heads discussing the terrorist activities relating to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Elibiary’s reference to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) goes back to a 2011 resolution the Obama administration approved of. At the time, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton agreed to a U.N. Human Rights Council proposal known as resolution 16/18”. CNS News reported at the time:
The head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has acknowledged that a U.N. religious tolerance resolution heavily promoted by the Obama administration has the same aims as the Islamic blocs annual religious defamation resolutions, which Western democracies have consistently opposed for more than a decade.
The State Department this week hosted three days of talks with foreign governments and international organizations, including the OIC, on implementing resolution 16/18, a measure adopted by consensus without a vote at the U.N. Human Rights Council last March and set to be endorsed by the full U.N. General Assembly within days.
The resolution, formally entitled combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons based on religion or belief, has been championed by the administration and some human rights advocacy groups as a historic achievement, in that it supposedly seeks a balance between freedom of religion and freedom of expression.
It was hailed as a shift away from earlier defamation of Islam (later changed to defamation of religion) resolutions introduced by the OIC, and duly voted through each year at both the Human Rights Council and the General Assembly in recent years, by steadily smaller margins.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday told the closing session of the meeting at the State Department that the adoption of resolution 16/18 had ended 10 years of divisive debate where people were not listening to each other anymore.
A problem with resolution 16/8 is how other countries will choose to interpret the resolutions language. CNS News also interviewed Elizabeth Kendal, an international religious liberty analyst and advocate who said resolution 16/18 was far from being a breakthrough for free speech
is actually more dangerous than the religious defamation resolutions.
The Regime has shown the enemy is no longer Al queda but Conservatives. Look how the Regime demonized Conservatives over the debt limit while now working to help the Pali terrorist regime.
Obama did out himself as a muslim, an unintentional admission
Did we give Iraq any F-16 s? If so time to destroy them. Destroy any M1 tanks, anything Iran can get their hands on.
It is not just what we gave Iraq, but also what we have given to Syria, Egypt, Libya all under this President! And ...destroy them? I am confident that is not in Imam Obama's plans.
Where the hell is our congress and why won’t they do anything???
What a nightmare we are living in!
My hate for Obama grows exponentially day by day!
By his actions, Obama's supported Muslim causes over the American cause. What should any sensible person make of this?
The GOP also fears them.
ping
Obama also clearly stated he would stand with the Muslims should the winds blow in a bad direction.
But...But it is not just Obama...as I posted on another thread this morning,
To think Obama incompetent or insane, it to be in denial of the truth.
Prosecute Janet Napolitano for conspiracy to commit espionage!
Did he say whether he favors the Sunni side or the Shiites?
What could possibly go wrong?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.