Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bushbacker1
"One of the rules established at the beginning of the hearing was no questions about Bergdahl."

Is that speculation or verifiable fact?

157 posted on 06/11/2014 10:51:38 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Buffalo Head
Is that speculation or verifiable fact?

The chairman did suggest that discussion of Bergdahl at this hearing was beyond the scope. He's right - the hearing is to get information on the 30 day notification requirement that was ignored.

We do not want testimony specifically about Bergdahl at this point. The process has to work in proper order with him.

158 posted on 06/11/2014 10:56:37 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: Buffalo Head

Look or listen to McKeon’s opening statement.


171 posted on 06/11/2014 4:24:05 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson