Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Make a long story short--the Administration was willing to take the short end of the prisoner swap in hopes that these cave dwelling savages would entertain a "larger conversation" about the future of Afghanistan.
1 posted on 06/05/2014 7:53:25 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Brad from Tennessee; P-Marlowe

The author has a pretty shallow answer to what the goal was.

In my mind, it’s an Occam’s razor kind of thing:

1. He wants to empty Guantanamo and that gave him cover.

2. It happened the same day as his decision to gut the coal industry with CO2 standards, so that was the one thing that was pushed off the discussion cycle.

3. It has kicked the VA off the front page.

So, 3 reasons that make more sense to me than “they want to establish a stable future for Afghanistan.”


39 posted on 06/05/2014 8:42:23 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The only future of Azzaghanistan that the Taliban are interested in is getting back to thowing acid on school girls.


44 posted on 06/05/2014 9:00:13 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
That's the way I read it too. It was really a superficial look at what happened. (Is happening)

Politics aside, to talk about a peaceful Afghanistan without mentioning drug cultivation and drug traffic, is childish.

That kid getting released is just a pretext to cover some OTHER transaction which is much more insidious.

“O” knew there’d be objections to this but for what ever reason, he must feel it is worth the trouble, in the end.

Think about something ELSE even MORE objectionable and illicit... c’mon you KNOW he's capable of it.

45 posted on 06/05/2014 9:00:24 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I have seen this story before - 70 years ago to be exact!

The Democratic Administration of President Johnson did all kinds of political maneuvering and signal sending to get the North Vietnamese Government to make meaningful steps towards settling the conflict in Vietnam.

In the 1964 Presidential Campaign Goldwater was slammed by the Democrats and their media supporters for proposing a “purely military” solution to Vietnam. Well, guess what folks, 9 years later President Nixon executed a “purely military” solution to get the North Vietnamese back to the peace conference table - an operation called LINEBACKER and LINEBACKER II.

IMHO, the democrats were responsible for most of the 58,000 Americans KIA and I don’t know how many thousands of Vietnamese, North and South killed 1964 - 1972.

Is there anyone out there foolish enough to think this latest Democratic posturing is going to have a better outcome than their efforts in the 1960s?


46 posted on 06/05/2014 9:05:51 AM PDT by Nip (BOHEICA and TANSTAAFL - both seem very appropriate today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Appeasement
47 posted on 06/05/2014 9:10:57 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“Peace in our time.” — Neville Chamberlain


48 posted on 06/05/2014 9:14:44 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Truthfully, it's as if Obama were hoping to initiate an impeachment proceedings against him so that he could unify the base and bring them to the polls in November. He is truly the most divisive president ever.
50 posted on 06/05/2014 9:19:53 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The real goal was to strengthen the Taliban so that they could further weaken the US military by killing as many of the “psychopaths” who fight for us as possible. No doubt the last 10,000 or so sitting ducks left as we abandon Afghanistan will be some of our best, most experienced troops.


56 posted on 06/05/2014 11:48:50 AM PDT by Ragnar54 (Obama replaced Osama as America's worst enemy and Al Qaeda's financier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson