Really, which ones? I recall him losing an extremely close Senate race (where he won the popular vote), but WINNING a House race PLUS four election to the state legislature. Which puts him in an entirely different league than a guy who lost for Senate, AND Congress AND the state legislature, over and over, by BIG margins, every time, but you guys still blindly worship him and will continue to support him if he runs again. But hey, if it makes you feel better to compare some obscure mayor who never wins to "Abraham Lincoln", have fun with your delusion.
>> Ronald Reagan lost to Gerald Ford, Reagan supported Goldwater and he lost. Guess Reagan should have given up after being rejected by the voters who didnt like him, yeah/s <<
Ah I see. You're counting campaigning for ANOTHER candidate as "losing an election", even though he wasn't running for anything. Is that where you got your "seven losses" for Lincoln from? Well if I was going to judge Lonegan by that criteria, then he's probably actually "lost" about three dozens times instead of six. Do you really want to play this game?
>> support the big govt Republican but dont whine when they impose high taxes and walk across the aisle to help Democrats impose Marxism on your state <<
Again, you must be referring to Lonegan, who already walked across the aisle providing his support for Democrats to impose high taxes in New Jersey. Don't worry, I don't whine when my candidate loses and claims the "liberal Republican establishment" rigged it. You guys have already mastered the whining game and pull the liberal tactic of crying how its everyone else's fault when your candidate turns off voters in droves and gets his butt kicked. Boo hoo. Not to worry, you can run him again in 2016 and scream "ABRAHAM LINCOLN!" and "LIBERAL ESTABLISHMENT CHEATED!" when Lonegan runs the same terrible campaign and loses again. I guess its much easier when you play victim like the Dems and never accept responsibility for your team having a lousy candidate.
“But in April 2013, the city council of Randolph, NJ under Tom MacArthur raised taxes 3.69% in one year, despite noting that the towns ratable base actually contracted in size. This was on top of a previous 4.32% contentious tax increase in 2010.”
http://www.redstate.com/diary/rino411/2014/04/01/160539/
In NJ this is being a Conservative. Got to win with a tax raising Republican don’t bother trying to change the system. Accept big govt GOP. I get it.