Posted on 06/03/2014 10:02:03 AM PDT by Red Steel
" John Ekdahl @JohnEkdahl Follow If confirmed, this would be a bit of a game-changer. 9:52 AM - 3 Jun 2014"
Thats putting it mildly.
If this report from Fox News national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin is true, the Bergdahl affair just got a whole lot stickier:
"Jenna Lee ✔ @Jennafnc Follow Great reporting from @JenGriffinFNC - new report: Berghdal left behind a note renouncing American citizenship...developing... 9:43 AM - 3 Jun 2014"
"David Shor @IshYimini Follow
OMG. https://twitter.com/jennafnc/status/473852493286633472
he left us behind. This is a game changer. He should be happy we didn't drone him. 9:53 AM - 3 Jun 2014"
(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...
MMaschin,
Many many thanks for that research!
All y’all, ping to MMaschin’s info!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=68#68
See info posted by MMaschin:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=68#68
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=187#187
Allen West is calling for 0’s impeachment:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=99#99
here’s an interesting tweet:
“BOTH SIDES WORKING FOR AL QUAEDA”
Steve King @SteveKingIA · 59m
#Susan Rice lied 2 American people again (#Bergdahl taken in battle) Looks like both sides swapees & negotiators are working for Al Qaeda.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=83#83
Allen West is calling for 0s impeachment:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=99#99
heres an interesting tweet:
BOTH SIDES WORKING FOR AL QUAEDA
Steve King @SteveKingIA · 59m
#Susan Rice lied 2 American people again (#Bergdahl taken in battle) Looks like both sides swapees & negotiators are working for Al Qaeda.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163183/posts?page=83#83
Thanks, WildHighlander57.
Ping to 204.
Apparently BB was never a POW with the Teleban but was a hostage of a group from Pakastan know for kidnapping people for ransom. Ollie North and others have explained the difference and how it will effect his legal stand. Lots of conflicting material. Much of it put out by DC and their agents
The five detainees look more and more like smoke cover for using tax money to pay the ransom
“or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state;”
With respect, that is not always true. Like all countries, the USA is not averse to loaning officers to allies, with no risk of them losing their citizenship for taking a post in an allied army command. It comes down to permission being granted by the Pentagon. In times of active warfare, for example WW2, permission is implied as having been granted, and no penalty is judged against them.
The brass is not always completely foolish. Units get separated and sometimes repatriation is difficult and time consuming.
Thanks, WH57. Good links; both of them.
Now we know the reason why our SpecOp CO’s refused any rescue meetings to save this deserting traitor. He was helping the Taliban on how to defeat his former Army buddies.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3163137/posts
Special forces found Bergdahl and captors but wouldnt risk rescue for deserter
Washington Times ^ | 06/03/2014 | Guy Taylor
Posted by SeekAndFind
The Pentagon on several occasions had ground-level intelligence on where ArmySgt. Bowe Bergdahl was being held captive at various times down to how many gunmen were guarding him but special operations commanders repeatedly shelved rescue missions because they didnt want to risk casualties for a man they believed to be a deserter, sources familiar with the mission plans said.
Commanders on the ground debated whether to pull the trigger on a rescue several times in recent years, according to one of the sources, a former high-level intelligence official in Afghanistan, who said the conclusion each time was that the prospect of losing highly trained troops was too high a price to pay for rescuing a soldier who walked away from his unit before being captured by the enemy.
A second source told The Washington Times that the rescue operation plans were high risk and became even less attractive in recent months when officials in the Pentagons Joint Special Operations Command grew convinced that the Taliban and the militant Haqqani network, whose operatives were holding Sgt. Bergdahl, were eager to cut a deal for his release.
I also read that there was shoot on sight orders as they believed Bergdahl was aiding and abetting the enemy.
WH apologizes to Senate intel chief for prisoner swap secret
Feinstein told reporters that she received a call from Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken on Monday evening apologizing for what the administration is calling an oversight.
I had a call from the White House last night, from Tony Blinken, apologizing for it, she said.
He apologized and said it was an oversight, she added.
$inator DiFi says the White House broke the law on Bergdahl.
“I also read that there was shoot on sight orders as they believed Bergdahl was aiding and abetting the enemy.”
Apparently, Bergdahl showed his Taliban buddies how to avoid the ambushes our soldiers used.
AN OVERSIGHT!!!!??????? You expect me to believe that bullshit. IMPEACH THE DICTATOR!
IMPEACH?? No .... that is exactly what the DICTATOR Obama wants. He intends to push the country to impeachment because he KNOWS the DNC (Demorats) may lose the Senate next fall. The GOP needs 2/3rds of the Senate for a full impeachment. It will be Clinton all over again. The GOP got blamed for it, nothing happened except they lost the next best of two elections....impeachment should happen, but only if most of the country agrees. How do you get around that??????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.