If you spent less time putting people in boxes and more time paying attention to the facts you might actually wind up as smart as you think you are. Meanwhile most of the “problems” you see are actually solved right now in other hardware (medical, military, mining, shipping), it’s just a matter of getting it in cars.
I have a dumb question.
If this is so easy....what on earth is Google spending their money on?
Shouldn’t they just hire you?
IOW, doesn’t the reality that one of the largest computer related companies in the world is still trying to work out the details give you pause?
Isn’t illogical to dismiss my statements about the cost of the electronics - when Google is in actuality using the exact electronics I am describing?
Does it really make sense to claim the technology already exists and for the most part is already installed on cars....when Google have to bolt on 150k more to get it to work as a prototype?
All of these questions are outside the context of my argument. It challenges why we are even having the argument. It makes no sense whatsoever, unless of course, you are smarter than the collective knowledge at Google
Or perhaps it might be a tad bit more complicated than what you make it out to be.
Put another way....either Google should hire you....or you are wrong. And if you can’t march up to their headquarters, and bang on their door with a million dollar salary demand, I am right.
Disagree? Point out where my logic falls apart.