Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: achilles2000
achilles2000: "If asserting that states have the right to secede makes me “pro-confederate”, then I am in good company with the Founding Fathers."

As I've said now several times: our Founders fully acknowledged a "right to secede" with mutual consent, or as a result of "oppression" or "injury", etc.

What no Founder -- zero, zip, nada -- acknowledged was a "right to secede" "at pleasure".
And yet, when the Deep South began to declare secession after the November 1860 election it was clearly understood by all, at the time, to be secession "at pleasure".

FRiend, it takes a determined effort to ignore these basic facts, and it is that effort itself which is the heart and soul of being "pro-Confederate".

167 posted on 05/26/2014 4:14:54 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

What would the Southern states had to do to secede with mutual consent?

It seems to me that this would require begging release from a tyrant.


169 posted on 05/26/2014 4:16:58 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

You evidently haven’t read the Bill of Rights.


183 posted on 05/26/2014 8:25:47 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson