Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2014 8:04:18 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Cowards. The lot of them.


2 posted on 05/05/2014 8:07:30 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Pretty good indication this won’t be settled peacefully.


3 posted on 05/05/2014 8:10:04 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Vote Democrat. Once you're OK with killing babies the rest is easy. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Glad I live in an open carry state. Perhaps all the non gunners should live in certain states with the “amish” and leave the rest of us a lone.


5 posted on 05/05/2014 8:12:13 AM PDT by defconw (Well now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

In a few years when the court is made up with a majority of liberals that make rulings based on ideology and foreign laws (instead of the constitution) they will accept all 2nd amendment cases.


6 posted on 05/05/2014 8:15:07 AM PDT by GregoTX (Remember the Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
At issue was New Jersey's Handgun Permit Law, which requires applicants to prove they have a "justifiable need" before local officials will issue a handgun carry permit.

Who gets to decide what "justifiable need" is? Seems to me that a God given right needs no justification from men.

9 posted on 05/05/2014 8:40:00 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator ( 2+2 = V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Obamatrons must have major blackmail items on multiple justices, and probably threatened Roberts he better not take any more 2nd Adm. cases, or else. Thug government.


10 posted on 05/05/2014 8:40:26 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

To Hell w NJ.

I’ll carry what I want, when “I” believe its necessary.

Since I believe “concealed” means “concealed”, I don’t expect to have to address the subject unless I’ve already demonstrated my need.


11 posted on 05/05/2014 8:56:54 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This is why you need to act at the state level for such things. This is an issue that should be the focus of state elections and throwing out those that pass such laws and replace them with people that are pro-liberty.


15 posted on 05/05/2014 9:07:37 AM PDT by whtabtbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

16 posted on 05/05/2014 9:11:22 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
[Art., quoting Alan Gura] "If the government can force you to provide a reason to exercise your right, then it's no longer a right."

Not quite right. The right still exists; the government is merely attempting to infringe or deny the right (and injure the citizen for its own purposes).

27 posted on 05/05/2014 3:35:55 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson